When my family road trips, we go all out. Bumming it on the beach or lazing around the Airbnb just isn’t our speed. Don’t get me wrong, I love a solid beach day, but maximizing our exploration is our top priority. To put it simply, the more miles we cover, the better.

A common fear is that kids spell the end of carefree travel. And in fairness, we’ve certainly changed some things. But patience, a willingness to try new things, and the right gear have kept us on the move!

This year, constant snow and bitter temps in Minnesota had us looking south. The jungles and coastlines of Costa Rica felt like the perfect spot for a new adventure, and we were excited for our toddler to join.

But from a gear perspective, road-tripping with a toddler felt a bit like a backpacking excursion. You want to have all the essential amenities but also cut your weight (and items!) as much as possible. The best pieces of gear will serve multiple purposes.

During our 10 days in Costa Rica, we explored five towns, traveled 300+ miles, and stopped at every beach possible. We brought a lot of gear with us. But the gear below proved absolutely essential to our trip. It helped us see as much of the country as our 4×4 rental (and kid!) could handle.

Essential Gear: Adventure Vacation With a Toddler

Backpack Child Carrier

If we could have only brought one piece of gear, it would be a backpack child carrier. Let’s face it — one of the most daunting realities about traveling with toddlers is that they are both very mobile and also want to be carried at the same time. Oh yeah, and they weigh about the same as a 20-pound kettlebell.

Using a backpack child carrier allows you to carry and contain your kiddo with ease. It also allows a great bird’s-eye view for them! For us, the best part about a backpack carrier is that it became a mobile crib. Our little guy would doze off and rest while we continued to explore.

We used The Osprey Poco during airport layover naps, jungle night walks, busing through cities, a coffee and chocolate tour, hiking to waterfalls, and much more.

The Poco carrier comes in a couple of different models, but we found the standard Poco worked best. Functions we appreciated included the built-in sunshade and the storage section within the base. The two grab handles at the top and the easy-to-access kickstand made picking up and setting down the carrier easy.

Don’t skip out on the extra accessories if you can manage it. For us, that meant the Poco Carrying Case. The Poco itself is a bit clunky when not in use, and this case allows you to carry the Poco more easily and check it on your flight!

Travel Tent

Our family took a 10-day road trip in California a couple of months prior to our Costa Rica trip. While the trip was a delight, we went through a pretty dramatic sleep regression. We don’t normally co-sleep, so it was really challenging for all three of us to be in the same room.

We even tried putting the travel crib in the bathroom and small closets, but our little guy wasn’t here for it. For this larger trip, we wanted to set us all up for success, so we brought a tent for the travel crib.

The Slumber Pod is a blackout tent that goes over your travel crib. Or, if you have older kids, they can use it just like a tent. The tent takes about 3 to 5 minutes to set up and is super flexible. Wherever the crib fits, you can put the tent over the crib. There is a main zipper where you have access into the tent, and two small pockets up top.

We had a fan in one pocket and a sound machine in the other pocket. We used the fan that came with the slumber pod but it requires to be plugged in, so I suggest buying a fan that is chargeable or is battery-operated.

Every night, we’d turn off the room lights, sing a short lullaby, and put our little man in his tent. About 30 seconds later, we’d turn the room lights back on, bust out the playing cards and crack a beer. It truly was a game-changer.

Food Containers

After several road trips and flights I’ve learned my lesson on food containers: Bring them!

We wasted way too many leftovers because the to-go box didn’t fit in the cooler or was dropped and spilled all over the floor. And a fed baby is a happy baby, am I right?

Having to-go containers allowed us to always have meals and snacks with us. This was essential when a hike or a drive took longer than expected.

The Kleen Kanteen Food Box set came in handy on day one, in the first hour of our trip. We had a 6 a.m. flight, so we grabbed some egg bites and pastries for the three of us right before we boarded. We thought that we’d eat right away once we got settled on the flight, but his nap schedule had other plans.

The egg bites and pastries fit nicely in the food boxes until we were ready for them a couple of hours later. And when it was time to dig in, they weren’t smooshed! Better yet, the food boxes are made of stainless steel so they were still a little warm!

Every single time we went out to eat, we had leftovers. It was awesome to have these durable (and leakproof!) containers with us to keep every last bite!

Water Bottles

As a dyed-in-the-wool gear junkie, there is one thing I have a lot of — water bottles. And it is no different for my toddler. For our trip, we actually brought two.

This might seem excessive but it was nice to have a bottle for milk and one for water. That way, we always had access to whichever beverage he wanted (fewer tantrums?).

There are a million different water bottle types, so how do you choose?! For us, we switched to a CamelBak Eddy+ for kids right after we weaned our kiddo off of nursing and bottles. With its well-known “Flip-Bite-Sip” function, it seemed like a natural option. We also received the recommendation from several other parents. We use this bottle for both milk and water, and it’s been great.

Truly, what I love about this is its 14-ounce size — super easy for our toddler to handle. And when those hands are tired, you can easily carabiner it onto a backpack. Also, it is dishwasher-safe, and it all comes apart, which makes cleaning a breeze.

Sun-Protective Clothes

Leaving Minnesota’s -20 winter for 90 degrees can be a bit of a shock. As Midwesterners, when we fly south during the winter, we are always extra cautious about the sun those first couple of days. So of course, it was important to us that we both have ample amounts of sunscreen (we love BabyBum Mineral Sunscreen) and a sun shirt. When you are out all day, it’s easy to forget to reapply sunscreen.

But as a new parent, I didn’t want to take any chances.

Patagonia’s Baby Capilene Silkweight UPF Hoodie kept our little guy covered up when the rays were high. The hoodie checks all of my boxes for a sun shirt: lightweight, dries quickly, and is UPF 40. When he refused to wear his hat, we were able to put his hood up, keeping his head protected for more time exploring.

At the beach, in the jungle, at dinner — your kiddo gets wet, sandy, dirty, and messy. Having a pair of quick-drying and easy-to-clean pair of shorts allows you to bring fewer clothes overall.

Baby baggies — did you know there was such a thing? I didn’t until now. Now, we are a full-on baggie family. Between the three of us, we had 10 (yes, 10!) pairs of baggie shorts with us on the trip.

They are lightweight, dry quickly, have pockets, and the list goes on. If you pair it with the right shirt, you can easily go from exploring to dinner in these bad boys. I could truly write a love letter to these iconic shorts.

Bonus baggies: The Baby Baggie Pants might have been the real star of the trip. Like the shorts, they are super light and dry quickly. When we were out in the sun for long periods of time and we couldn’t keep the sunscreen on, we’d put him in these, keeping those little legs protected.

Shoes

I went back and forth about what type of shoes would work best, but once I decided that we needed a pair of close-toed shoes everything else became easy.

I never thought I’d be a Croc mom but I am here for it. And, surprise — we have a matching pair!

I love them because they are lightweight, easy to clean, keep his little toes covered, have great traction, and stay on their feet! High in the mountains of Monteverde, the temps dropped at night, and there were days where we even rocked the socks n’ crocks look.

Zippies and Blanket

Our child has been wearing merino wool since the day he arrived earthside! Merino Wool has temperature-regulating properties that help keep you warm when it’s cool and cool when it’s warm.

The iksplor Adventure Zippie became his official airport outfit (don’t lie, we all have one). We love that the Adventure Zippie has a two-way zipper — making those airplane diaper changes a lot easier. It’s also UPF 50 and moisture-wicking.

We also brought the Adventure Blanket! This merino wool blanket came in clutch. We used the blanket over the car seat while we were in the car for sun protection. We also used it in his crib, at the beach, and in the jungle when temps dropped.

The best part about iksplor Merino Wool? It’s machine washable.

Baby Chair

Why bring a baby chair? This may seem over-the-top, but we actually found it useful in many situations. For one, high chairs can be really hit-and-miss wherever you go — I’d argue even here in the States.

I have found that when Leo is sitting independently on his own, he focuses on eating a lot more (and so can I!). We used his chair at restaurants, hotel rooms, and picnics; we even used it at the beach.

How are these chairs not in REI yet? They are incredible. The Summer Pop ‘n Sit chair is a glorified baby camp chair. It’s a chair that comes with a cute little bag, a tray, and four straps to secure the chair when needed.

There is also a buckle on the chair to buckle your little one in to keep him from climbing out.

‘Snackle Box’

As parents, we know that snacks are king. And, while this isn’t specifically for babies, it makes the perfect “snackle-box.”

What is a “snackle-box,” you ask? It is typically a plastic fishing lure box filled with snacks for kids (peak Midwest!), but I couldn’t find a fishing lure box small enough for the trip, so we ended up using the largest Cotopaxi packing cubes.

It was perfect to fit dozens of snacks, foldable cups (we used Sea-to-Summit’s X Cups), a couple of sporks, and shelf-stable milk. The handle on the side is great for pulling it out from a cooler or a bag with ease.

On the flight or while we were waiting for dinner, the zipper would also keep busy little hands entertained.

Your Bags

Now that you have all of your clothes, accessories, snacks, and shoes (and the list goes on) all laid out, you need to figure out what kind of bag you want to bring. For me, I need my bags to check a couple of boxes: roller or backpack, durable enough for me to throw or drag, and brightly colored so I can always spot it.

I’ve been traveling with Patagonia’s black hole bags for almost a decade and I’ve never looked back. Again, another item I could write a love letter to. I had no idea how crucial they would be when it came to traveling with kids.

Out of the Black Hole family, we brought the 120L Duffel (note, this size was discontinued in 2018, but if you can find one on Worn Wear, snatch it up!), 100L roller bag, Waist Pack 5L, and a daypack. I suggest the Ultralight Black Hole Tote Pack 27L. Yes, we’re a Patagonia family, but REI, The North Face, Black Diamond, and Big Agnes all make extra-large (and small-size) duffels.

It says it in the name but it’s truly a black hole. We were able to fit the Slumber Pod, Chair, Travel Crib, beach toys, and other miscellaneous gear all in the 120L bag while all of our clothes and shoes fit in the 100L.

It is also my theory that because the Black Hole bags stand out with such bright colors, it’s why we’ve never lost a bag (knock on wood!).

Conclusion

I was really nervous about becoming a parent and what that might mean for my passion for travel. Many people choose to leave their little ones behind, and while there is a time and place for that, I’ve found real meaning in traveling together.

Armed with the right gear and a willing spirit, I now have a new reason to travel, to show my boy this great big world.

Van Life with kids

” data-image-caption=”

(Photo/Jake Ferguson)

” data-medium-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2022/11/Mother-and-Daughter-in-a-Converted-Campervan-Vanlife-With-A-Kid1-300×200.jpg” data-large-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2022/11/Mother-and-Daughter-in-a-Converted-Campervan-Vanlife-With-A-Kid1-700×467.jpg” />

How to Van Life With Kids: Tips and Gear for Family Life on the Road

Van life with kids isn’t easy, but it can be very rewarding. These are our first-hand experiences, tips, tricks, and gear recommendations. Read more…

The post Adventure Travel With a Toddler: Basic Gear for a Fun, Active Getaway appeared first on GearJunkie.

Passing into the realm of the up-there requires not only a mindset change, but also a good change of clothing. Waterproof, burly, and breathable; hardshell jackets provide it all for your next foray into mountaineering, backcountry skiing, alpine climbing, or just downright miserable weather. 

After a season spent above treeline, we winnowed our closet down to the most capable hardshell jackets on the market in 2023. Included are shells for every alpine mission, from lightweight options for smash-and-grab summit bids to flexible hardshells for ski-bound romps, to burly alpine armor that will see you through to the other side of any mountain squall.

During testing, we sought out high-mountain terrain that would sufficiently test the weatherproofing, durability, and livability of these jackets. We paid special mind to long-term performance over 24-hour periods, and our testing included input from alpine enthusiasts of every stripe, from current American Mountain Guides Association-certified guides to weekend warriors.

Below we’ve brought together the best hardshell jackets that made the grade during our travels. If you’re new to the world of hardshells, be sure to consult our comprehensive buyer’s guide and FAQ section for a deep dive into what makes a hardshell so hard, as well as our comparison chart to weigh jackets against one another.

The Best Hardshell Jackets of 2023

• Best Overall Hardshell Jacket: Arc’teryx Beta AR Jacket
• Best Budget Hardshell Jacket: Rab Namche Jacket
• Best Runner-Up Hardshell Jacket: Mammut Nordwand Advanced HS Jacket
• Best Hardshell for Extreme Alpinism: Arc’teryx Alpha SV Jacket
• Best Lightweight Hardshell Jacket: Patagonia Storm10 Jacket
• Best Hardshell Jacket for Ski Mountaineering: Ortovox 3L Ortler Jacket

Best Overall Hardshell Jacket

Arc’teryx Beta AR Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 40D/80D 3L GORE-TEX Pro Most Rugged
• Waterproof rating (mm) 28,000
• Breathability rating (RET) <9
• Fit Regular
• Pockets Two handwarming pockets
• Weight 1 lb.
• Best for General mountaineering, ski-touring, alpine rock

Pros

• Versatile feature set
• Unique raised collar for weather protection
• Built with Most Rugged GORE-TEX tech

Cons

• Most Rugged version of GORE-TEX Pro has lower breathability
• No two-way front zipper

Nick Belcaster

One metric was truly the deciding factor for landing the Arc’teryx Beta AR Jacket ($600) at the top of the heap, and it’s all in the name. All Round. In a pile of hyper-specialized hardshells, versatility is the name of the game, and the Beta AR balances the scales with ease.

The GORE-TEX Pro variant used in this hardshell is made with Most Rugged tech, a textile that was a collaboration between the teams at Arc’teryx and GORE, and one that touts extreme durability. A 40D face fabric used across the body of the jacket creates a lightweight shell, and is balanced against panels of 80D fabric used in areas of high wear. The perfect combo, in our tester’s opinion.

One of our favorite features of the Beta AR was the tall protective collar, a 2.5-inch tall barrier that allows you the choice of keeping the hood down during gusty conditions. We loved having the choice of a middle-ground option when weather started to kick up, and the microsuede lining on the interior of the collar makes for a comfortable cockpit.

To test the mettle of the Beta AR, we ski toured in Pacific Northwest storm cycles, dry-tooled at dripping crags, and explored the glaciers of the North Cascades National Park, and throughout it all the Beta came out smiling.

While many strictly alpine-focused shells will sacrifice handwarmer pockets in lieu of more function-driven chest pockets, this hardshell opts instead to retain the hand pockets, and adds an additional pocket on the interior of the jacket for extra storage. Not every trip is going to be full-tilt, and having the ability to warm your hands certainly kept us out longer during testing. 

Though both the Beta AR and Alpha SV jackets reside under the regular fit label from Arc’teryx, we found the Beta to better represent the title, while the later jacket was a bit roomier. Perfect for the mountaineer, alpine climber, or ice-aficionado who wants a jacket that’ll do it all, the Arc’teryx Beta AR hits the spot.

Check Men’s Price at REICheck Women’s Price at REI

Best Budget Hardshell Jacket

Rab Namche GORE-TEX Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 75D 3L GORE-TEX
• Waterproof rating (mm) 28,000
• Breathability rating (g/m²) 17,000
• Fit Regular
• Pockets Two handwarming
• Weight 15.3 oz.
• Best for General mountaineering, alpine rock climbing

Pros

• Budget pricing
• High-end waterproofing
• Cozy fleece-lined collar

Cons

• Breathability is lacking compared to higher-end membranes
• Hood isn’t quite helmet-compatible

Nick Belcaster

Let’s be clear: Hardshell jackets aren’t cheap. But that doesn’t mean you need to spend the big bucks to get your hands on some high-quality protection. The Rab Namche GORE-TEX Jacket ($350) slides in hundreds of dollars below many of the other jackets on our list, and in our testing held up to much of the same abuse.

Crafted from the tried and true 3L GORE-TEX membrane, this jacket puts up the same impressive waterproofing numbers as other GORE membrane shells, but suffers a bit when it comes to breathability at a rated 17,000 g/m². This doesn’t mean it was a slouch in our testing, just that it’ll be one of the first to tap when it comes to high-humidity conditions and hard treks.

The cut is a general all-around style, meaning there’s space beneath for a light fleece, but not much else. The sleeves are articulated for easy overhead reaches or swings, and the underarm vents help make up the difference when really chugging along.

In the field, we took the Namche everywhere we went in our other hardshells — working our way up snowfields and skintracks, and found that this jacket can hang tough. The 75D exterior is a strong weave, and we’ve got confidence that it’ll stand up to seasons of abuse. We were also impressed by the number of features the Namche retains at its price, including a cinch hem, pit zips, wire-stiffened hood brim, and expansive chest pockets.

One of our biggest laments about the Namche is the lack of a truly helmet-compatible hood, which can be a real bummer when conditions are truly brutal and you want to tuck away. We found in testing that a lower profile climbing helmet will fly, but only just. It is, thankfully, a very adjustable hood, like its sibling the Rab Latok Mountain.

Perfect for mountaineers who have already blown their paycheck on the latest boots and tools, the Rab Namche Jacket makes a perfectly serviceable hardshell, and at a much lower price point than others available today.

Check Price at BackcountryCheck Price at REI

Runner-Up Hardshell Jacket

Mammut Nordwand Advanced HS Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 30D 3L GORE-TEX Pro Most Breathable
• Waterproof rating (mm) 28,000
• Breathability rating (RET) <6
• Fit Regular
• Pockets Two napoleon chest pockets
• Weight 1 lb.
• Best for Extended expeditions, ice climbing

Pros

• Generous pit zips for venting
• Long-lasting DWR finish
• Burly but lightweight 30D fabric

Cons

• Price
• Typical crinkle from GORE-TEX Pro

Nick Belcaster

The word burly gets tossed around a good bit when describing hardshell jackets, but we can assure you that the Mammut Nordwand Advanced HS Jacket ($650) is among the worthy. This jacket doesn’t leave much on the cutting room floor and has the grit to hold out when it’s time to slam the shutters closed.

The Nordwand Advanced HS makes use of the GORE-TEX PRO Most Breathable textile, a variant that bumps up overall breathability at a slight durability ding. The 30D face fabric further bolsters the venting, and while there’s still the unavoidable crinkle of GORE PRO, we found the materials used in the Nordwand to be confidence-inspiring.

At the front of the jacket, two cross-accessible chest pockets are externally pleated to keep bulk to a minimum within the jacket itself. The underarm pit zips are among the most generous we’ve seen at 17 inches long and are dual-zip equipped for easy open and close. And inside the jacket, a small zippered slash pocket stores valuables like a sunscreen stick.

This jacket is similar to the Arc’teryx Alpha SV in terms of roomy cut and feature set — namely the choice of chest over hand pockets and oversized hood and wrist cuffs. These options lean more into the hunker-down ethos, and both jackets are among our top choices for the worst of the worst weather. Compared to the Alpha, we actually prefer the application of the Most Breathable GORE PRO in the more well-rounded Nordwand, over the Alpha’s Most Rugged.

While not the most environmentally friendly, the DWR treatment on the Nordwand is undeniable. This jacket continued to shed water during a particularly wet Pacific Northwest spring far longer than many of the other jackets we tested.

The price tag certainly stings a bit on the Nordwand Advanced HS, but when it comes to an investment piece like a hardshell jacket, the absolute weather protection provided proved far worth the lightening of our wallets.

Check Men’s Price at MammutCheck Women’s Price at Mammut

Best Hardshell for Extreme Alpinism

Arc’teryx Alpha SV Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 100D 3L GORE-TEX Pro Most Rugged
• Waterproof rating (mm) 28,000
• Breathability rating (RET) <9
• Fit Roomy
• Pockets Two napoleon chest pockets
• Weight 1 lb., 2 oz.
• Best for Deep expeditions, mixed rock, and ice climbing

Pros

• Burly 100D outer face fabric paired with GORE’s Most Rugged tech
• Excellent water-resistant zippers
• Integrated RECCO reflector

Cons

• Price
• Breathability is on the lower end

Nick Belcaster

With almost 25 years under its hem, the Arc’teryx Alpha SV Jacket ($800) makes no excuses for itself when it comes to big terrain, rough weather, and the prospect of an extended stay. Arc’teryx has a well-worn groove in the hardshell game, and with its pinnacle Alpha SV offering being near archetypal at this point, it had little effort in proving itself the best for extreme alpine pursuits in our testing.

The Alpha SV (“Severe Weather”) truly shines when the sun doesn’t — thriving on the spindrift, driving rain, and howling winds that can turn an alpine route into a real sufferfest. A true ‘to-the-hilt’ build means this jacket is hewn from a 100D Most Rugged GORE-TEX Pro material, a new blend that ups the durability to easily the highest in our testing so far. 

The cut is pure alpine, tailoring to the movements of overhead ice tool swinging, ski touring, and the occasional chimney grovel. This articulated design is brought together with minimal stitching and makes use of narrow seam tape that both cuts down on bulk and increases available membrane for vapor relief. Smart.

While the jacket does lack hand-warming pockets, it makes up for it in other available storage for things like belay mittens or a V-thread tool. The twin napoleon pockets on the chest are slant for easy access, and are guarded by highly water-resistant zippers which in our own testing take their job seriously. No water penetrated through any of the zippers during a proper Pacific Northwest alpine storm.

We were a bit puzzled by the lack of a two-way front zipper, (in fact, none of Arc’teryx’s hardshell jackets feature such a zip) which typically can be a boon for belaying while under cover. A bit of tucking makes it manageable. 

Compared to a more all-around hardshell like the Beta AR, the Alpha SV feels like an idea taken to its natural (and rugged) conclusion. And at only an extra 2 ounces of weight, the bump up to a total 100D outer weave and inclusion of a few other alpine niceties means the Alpha is top dog in our book when the weather truly turns for the worst. We wouldn’t second guess ourselves to take this shell from the rime halls of Scotland to deep into the Kichatnas.

Read more about the Arc’teryx Alpha SV jacket in our in-depth review.

Check Men’s Price at REICheck Women’s Price at Arc’teryx

Best Lightweight Hardshell Jacket

Patagonia Storm10 Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 20D 3L H2No Performance Standard
• Waterproof rating (mm) 20,000
• Breathability rating (g/m²) Unavailable
• Fit Regular
• Pockets Two handwarming, one chest pocket
• Weight 8.3 oz.
• Best for Dry climates, volcano skiing, alpine rock climbing

Pros

• Very lightweight for a 3-layer membrane jacket
• Great packability with hang loop
• Built-in RECCO reflector
• Simple but effective hood adjustability

Cons

• Thinner face fabric
• Breathability can be overwhelmed by high-output activities

Nick Belcaster

At 8.3 ounces and about the size of a good offwidth fist stack when packed, the Patagonia Storm10 Jacket ($329) is a bit antithetical to the typical hardshell recipe. But with a true 3-layer build, this jacket was created with the mountains in mind and makes a compelling argument for going light with your hardshell when it makes sense.

Made from the same H2No membrane as its burlier sibling the Dual Aspect, the Storm10 boasts admirable waterproofing and acceptable breathability. It isn’t quite the action piece you’d want to be huffing and puffing all day in, but for passing squalls and dry snow, its shedding abilities impressed us.

We used the Storm10 this spring as our volcano skiing outer layer, where it turned stiff winds and blown snow with ease. The helmet-compatible hood, while only adjustable via a single cordlock at the back of the head, does feature elastic at the periphery of the opening that keeps the hood out of the way when turning your head.

Astute observers will note the lack of pit zips on this jacket, which while certainly cut to obtain the overall featherweight, do limit the ability to really move moisture out of the jacket. 

In terms of feature set, the Storm10 comes stripped down of a lot of the bulk that weights down more fortified hardshell jackets, but retains a number of important ones, such as dual handwarmer pockets (with internal hem adjustment), water-resistant zippers, a RECCO reflector, and a single chest pocket with hang loop for parking the shell on the back of your harness.

It won’t be your alpine fortress for everything, but for low-probability, high-consequence weather forecasts, the Storm10 Jacket more than makes the grade in our books.

Check Men’s Price at PatagoniaCheck Women’s Price at REI

Best Hardshell Jacket for Ski Mountaineering

Ortovox 3L Ortler Jacket

Specs

• Material construction Toray Dermizax NX
• Waterproof rating (mm) 20,000
• Breathability rating (g/m²) 40,000
• Fit Active/trim
• Pockets One napoleon chest pocket
• Weight 14.7 oz.
• Best for Ski-mountaineering, quick-paced (or tram-assisted) alpinism

Pros

• Lightweight and flexible shell
• Soft merino wool inserts on interior collar
• Impressive breathability
• Integrated stretch in fabric

Cons

• Fine-toothed zippers can be difficult to move
• Limited number of exterior pockets

Nick Belcaster

For long days on the skin track or technical entrances to steep couloir skiing, the Ortovox 3L Ortler Jacket ($550) impressed us the most when it came time to reach for a hardshell we wanted to use for ski-accessed pursuits in the mountains.

While GORE continues to dominate the heavy-duty waterproofing scene, the Dermizax NX fabric used in the Ortler jacket is one that we have been excited about for a while. This unique nonporous membrane specs out at 20,000 mm of waterproofing, and an impressive 40,000 g/m² breathability rating, placing it head and shoulders over many other membranes.

The added bonus of using a nonporous membrane is the inherent stretch incorporated into the material, which is key since the Ortler has what many in North America would call the Euro fit — a slimmer cut that prioritizes moving with the body over an ability to layer under the jacket. This is something we can absolutely get behind during high-output activities like ski touring.

While not the most feature-rich (the Ortler only hosts a single chest pocket, in addition to a small upper arm pocket), this hardshell hits the high points with a two-way adjustable hood, chunky wrist cuffs, 13-inch pit zips, and a two-way front zipper to accommodate ski-mountaineering harnesses. We will note that the zippers used in this jacket employ a finer tooth than most other hardshells, and when grappling at them with gloves on, they could be a little finicky to adjust.

Using the 3L Ortler Jacket this spring in the skin track, we found it to be the perfect companion for when squalls blew up and we needed the extra protection. While in other hardshells we typically need to unzip both pit zips and the main zip a bit to maintain the breathability equilibrium, the Ortler was perfectly happy buttoned up as we huffed into the high country.

Check Men’s Price at BackcountryCheck Women’s Price at Backcountry

Best of the Rest

Norrøna Trollveggen GORE-TEX Pro Light Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 40D/70D 3L GORE-TEX Pro Most Breathable
• Waterproof rating (mm) 28,000
• Breathability rating (RET) <6
• Fit Regular
• Pockets Two napoleon chest pockets
• Weight 1 lb., 1 oz.
• Best for Any and everything alpinism

Pros

• Protective drop hem and wrist collars
• Patterned face fabric design for increased durability
• Unique ‘X-open’ pit zip design
• Articulated cut

Cons

• Limited adjustability in hood
• Price

Nick Belcaster

While the name may not be familiar to some, the Norwegians behind Norrøna certainly know harsh weather — and how to protect against it. Norrøna was the first company to bring GORE-TEX to Europe, and since then has been refining its use for high-end hardshell wear like the Trollveggen Pro Light Jacket ($649).

This jacket certainly lives up the history as well. The shell is a more well-rounded version of the company’s straight-ahead Trollveggen Jacket, a storm bunker that uses 70D fabric throughout. In contrast, the Pro Light aims to be a more active and svelte version, opting for a 40D GORE-TEX Pro Most Breathable across the jacket, in addition to 70D reinforcements on the hood, shoulders, and elbows.

Given a “technical” fit label from Norrøna, the Trollveggen Pro Light is a bit trimmer than the rest of the brand’s more ski-focused shells, but that isn’t to say it’s snug. We find that Norrøna is second to only Arc’teryx when it comes to savvy articulated cuts that anticipate the maximum of motion the hardshell might expect to see during use.

Rounding out the alpine-centric feature set is a pair of napoleon pockets on the chest, asymmetric wrist cuffs with generous hand protection, a two-way front zip, underarm pit zips, and a long drop hem that provides protection for your backside. Set beside other jackets in our mix, this compares well to the Arc’teryx Alpha SV or Mammut Nordwand Advanced HS.

The hood, while generous and made to fit climbing and ski helmets alike, is only wrangled by a single cordlock at the rear of the head — which we found to be a bit light in the adjustability department. Without the further ability to batter down the hatches, this hood can flap a bit more than other hardshells.

Perfect for long alpine ridge routes or mixed terrain where the difference between making the move is mere inches, the Norrøna Trollveggen Pro Light has all of the baked-in mobility and durability to see you to the summit.

Check Men’s Price at BackcountryCheck Women’s Price at CampSaver

Patagonia Dual Aspect Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 30D 3L H2No Performance Standard
• Waterproof rating (mm) 20,000
• Breathability rating (g/m²) Unavailable
• Fit Regular
• Pockets Two handwarming, two napoleon chest pockets
• Weight 1 lb., 1 oz.
• Best for Alpine climbing, general mountaineering

Pros

• Zero PFC build
• Four total front of chest pockets, with clean profile
• Fit accommodates many body types

Cons

• Thinner 30D face fabric
• Less proven waterproof membrane

Nick Belcaster

One of the few hardshell jackets to toss the yoke of a build with PFCs in it (that’s perfluorinated chemicals), the Patagonia Dual Aspect ($479) is on the leading edge of what a hardshell jacket can be without harming the alpine environment you’ve set out to enjoy.

Patagonia has been ditching the nasty forever chemicals since 2019, but the Dual Aspect jacket is the first alpine-specific piece in the line-up to get the treatment. Crafted from Patagonia’s proprietary H2No 3-layer membrane, we found the Dual Aspect to perform on par with the original 3-layer GORE-TEX, with possibly a slight ding on the overall longevity of the waterproofing.

Typical of a Patagonia shell, we found the overall cut to be a little more generous than the slimmer jackets like the Ortovox Ortler or Helly Hansen Odin 9 World. This makes layering a breeze, and the slick jersey-backer interior allows for easy motion without bunching up. The sleeves are a bit long, but this allows for easy overhead tool swinging without hem-lift annoyance.

The chest profile of the Dual Aspect is a clean and snag-free design that ensures slings tossed over the shoulder won’t be a hassle to retrieve on lead. The twin chest pockets are hidden away behind storm flaps, and the two handwarmer pockets are set off to the side and above any harness or pack hipbelts.

We were surprised at the overall lightweight fabric used in this jacket — a 30-denier weave that while lightweight, kept our hackles up over the long-term durability. Even Patagonia’s top-tier GORE-TEX Pro build jacket, the Pluma, only uses a 40D face fabric. This doesn’t warrant full-time kid glove treatment, but that ice chimney you were eyeing may have a bit more bite than you want.

Pushing the scale in any one direction is bound to require some course correction, but by taking their time to refine the formula, Patagonia is moving the needle in the right direction when it comes to sustainable hardshells, and the Dual Aspect is proof positive of that.

Check Men’s Price at REICheck Women’s Price at Patagonia

Helly Hansen Odin 9 World Infinity Shell

Specs

• Material construction 3L LIFA Infinity Pro
• Waterproof rating (mm) Unavailable
• Breathability rating (g/m²) Unavailable
• Fit Active/trim
• Pockets Two handwarming, one napoleon chest pocket
• Weight 1 lb., 2.6 oz.
• Best for General mountaineering

Pros

• Large handwarmer pockets
• Good helmet adjustability
• RECCO reflector

Cons

• More trim/limiting overall fit
• Stiff fabric feel

Nick Belcaster

Sporting a new take on waterproofing, the Helly Hansen Odin 9 World Infinity Shell ($600) makes use of a waterproof membrane that makes the bold claim of never needing a DWR treatment again.

The LIFA Infinity Pro membrane is Helly Hansen’s proprietary new weave that combines an expanded polypropylene waterproof membrane with a LIFA face fabric that is inherently hydrophobic, requiring no chemical DWR finishes whatsoever to maintain waterproofness. Very tech.

During use, we found the Odin 9 World to be better poised as a ski or general mountaineering piece, versus something you might bring along on alpine rock. The unique weave is a bit stiffer than other hardshell jackets, and overall mobility is a bit limited for that reason.

The hood of the Odin 9 World was one of the more adjustable in our review, with buried cordlocks for the sides of the hood, as well as twin shockcords at the back of the hood to manipulate the crown and peripheral openings. A stiffened brim tops it off, along with a RECCO reflector that can make life easier for ski patrols and search and rescue outfits.

The two handwarmer pockets also bucked convention with dual zipper openings, as well as being externally pleated, meaning they expand outward when filled as opposed to toward the torso. Functionally we found that we often don’t carry enough in our jacket pockets to make much of a difference either way, but stashing bulky belay mitts would ride better in the Odin 9 World.

The fit of this hardshell jacket, unfortunately, is a bit snugger than we’d like, leaving little room for layering much beneath the shell when the temps dip. This is combined with a stiff material that doesn’t move very well with your body, which led to a bit of a wrestling match when pulling active moves on ice or rock. We’d recommend sizing up because of this.

Check Men’s Price at BackcountryCheck Women’s Price at Amazon

Rab Latok Mountain GORE-TEX Pro Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 40D/80D 3L GORE-TEX Pro Most Breathable
• Waterproof rating (mm) 28,000
• Breathability rating (RET) <6
• Fit Regular
• Pockets Two handwarming, one napoleon chest pocket
• Weight 1 lb., 1.8 oz.
• Best for Ice climbing, mixed climbing

Pros

• Smart feature set execution
• Helmet-compatible hood with impressive adjustability
• Two-way front zipper

Cons

• Front pockets share volume, which can get a bit snug

Nick Belcaster

Trust the Brits to nail the idea of a hardshell jacket. With two weights of GORE-TEX Pro Most Breathable, a two-way harness-friendly zipper, and one of the best hoods we’ve draped over our noggins, the Rab Latok Mountain ($525) hits all the high points we’re looking for.

With 80D GORE across the shoulders and sleeves, and 40D elsewhere, this jacket aims to shore up the durability where it’s needed and cut the weight where it’s not. A YKK Vislon front zip brings it all together, and is two-way directional to accommodate easy belaying while maintaining good coverage. There’s even a snap to keep the jacket from flapping away while opened.

While it does sport a generous opening for a gloved hand, the single chest pocket, unfortunately, shares volume with the left-hand warmer pocket, and in circumstances where both are occupied it can be a fight to get storage out of either.

We’ve always been fans of the care that Rab gives to the hoods of their hardshells, and the Latok Mountain is no different. The hood is three-way adjustable, with concealed cordlocks for the side adjustments tucked away near the chin of the hood. A wire-stiffened peak stays where you want it, and the whole hood can be stowed away when not needed. 

The only fault we can find is that this jacket’s hood lacks the unique ability that its higher-end cousin, the Latok Alpine, does: stashing the loose cord ends when extended and avoiding being flayed in the face by them in a stiff wind.

Rounding out the Latok Mountain are 15-inch underarm pit zips that feature two different types of zipper pulls — one plastic, one knotted cord — to help with differentiating which will open or close the vents. A smart design, which is actually something we could say about the whole of this jacket.

Check Men’s Price at RABCheck Women’s Price at RAB

The North Face Summit Torre Egger FUTURELIGHT Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 20D/70D 3L FUTURELIGHT
• Waterproof rating (mm) Unavailable
• Breathability rating (g/m²) 75,000
• Fit Regular
• Pockets Two handwarming, one napoleon chest pocket
• Weight 1 lb., 3.8 oz.
• Best for Quick-paced, done-in-a-day alpine missions

Pros

• Excellent breathability
• Hybrid fabric mapping bolsters moisture venting
• Soft suede inserts in hood

Cons

• Overall waterproofing suffers a bit for the breathability
• Heavier overall

Nick Belcaster

With a classic alpine cut, tasteful feature set, and a waterproof fabric that puts big breathability numbers up on the board, The North Face Summit Torre Egger Jacket ($575) is hard to deny. We’ve been big fans of the FUTURELIGHT membrane since it debuted in 2019, and it finds an excellent application in the Torre Egger, a hardshell that’s meant to be climbed in all day.

While most of the high-ranking hardshell jackets in our review utilize some flavor of GORE-TEX, The North Face has a good thing going for itself when it comes to its FUTURELIGHT membrane, which claims a breathability rate of 75,000 g/m². Unreal.

Adding to those impressive numbers is a hybrid fabric design on the Torre Egger, which uses a 70D recycled nylon across the body of the shell, and a 20D in the underarms to further increase moisture management. This cut is all sewn up with no shoulder seams to reduce wear areas, and gussets under the arms for full tool swinging ability.

So how does the Torre Egger stack up in the mountains? It can definitely hang. During our testing, we intentionally battened down the hatches and set about hiking up the hill, aiming to overwhelm the breathability. While no hardshell is magic (we’re waiting …), we can say that the Torre Egger held out the longest of any jacket in our review when it comes to moving moisture out.

This jacket compares easily to the Mammut Nordwand Advanced HS or Arc’teryx Beta AR jackets when it comes to overall fit and function. All utilize a premium waterproof membrane, similar prices, and boast feature sets that put them in the middle-upper ends of their respective lines. But when you prioritize breathability over all else? Grab the Torre Egger.

Check Men’s Price at BackcountryCheck Women’s Price at The North Face

Stio Objective Pro Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 70D 3L GORE-TEX Pro
• Waterproof rating (mm) 28,000
• Breathability rating (RET) <6
• Fit Regular
• Pockets Two handwarming, two napoleon chest pockets
• Weight 1 lb., 5 oz.
• Best for Ski-touring, resort skiing

Pros

• Feature-rich
• Pass-through front chest pocket
• Burly fabric denier

Cons

• On the heavier end of the scales
• Chest pockets share volume
• Price

Nick Belcaster

With a full GORE-TEX Pro build, smart hood design, and close to the most pockets of any jacket in our testing, the Stio Objective Pro Jacket ($699) follows the ideal hardshell jacket recipe and delivers a solid shell.

Cut from the ski-centric patterns of Jackson Hole-based Stio, the Objective Pro was made for the deep powder of the Tetons, but is adaptable enough to be brought along on mountaineering objectives. 

During testing, we appreciated the two-way front zipper on this jacket — not something we typically see on more ski-styled shells — as well as the helmet-compatible hood that accommodated both climbing and ski helmets.

Instead of opting to deck out this jacket in either lower torso pockets or high chest pockets, the Objective Pro goes for both — though unfortunately at the expense of sharing volume between pockets. This means that the pocket space overlap, and that filling one pocket greatly limits the usability of the other.

One bright side, however, is the novel inclusion of a ‘pass-through’ pocket on the jacket’s right chest, which allows for layering adjustment and grabbing an avalanche beacon without totally stripping the shell. Smart.

At 1 pound, 5 ounces, the Objective Pro certainly tips the scales compared to the rest of our line-up and is likely due to its all-70D construction (versus hybrid fabric weights in other jackets). This undoubtedly ups the durability, though at the expense of weight.

Check Price at Stio

Mountain Hardwear Viv Jacket

Specs

• Material construction 30D 3L GORE-TEX Pro
• Waterproof rating (mm) 28,000
• Breathability rating (RET) <6
• Fit Roomy
• Pockets Two handwarming, two napoleon chest pockets
• Weight 1 lb., 2 oz.
• Best for Ski-touring

Pros

• Feature-rich design tailored to ski-mountaineering
• Four total front of chest pockets, with additional two interior drop pockets, and single arm pocket
• Hood adjustment cords routed internally

Cons

• Roomy cut favors all-day insulation wearing, rather than layering flexibility

Nick Belcaster

Compared to the pared-down skimo styling of some jackets, the Mountain Hardwear Viv ($725) practically has the kitchen sink in additional features — even some we hadn’t encountered before. Among the most unique are a strip of fabric below the hood that functions as a radio mounting point, as well as deep internal drop pockets and a “skin pin” system for hanging climbing skins to warm.

All those features certainly don’t come for free, and the Viv is on the heavier end of the spectrum for jackets we tested at 1 pound, 2 ounces. But for those who need a hardshell jacket for a number of different mountain activities, this jacket fairly well covers the spread.

Made from a 30D GORE-TEX Pro waterproof membrane, you can be assured of high-level waterproofing and breathability performance with this jacket. Topping off the protection is a helmet-compatible hood, and underarm pit zips for venting off heat when the skin track turns into a booter.

When it comes to hood adjustments, the Viv is one of the few hardshell jackets that opt to route the front-of-hood adjustment cords to the inside of the hood (the other on our list being The North Face Torre Egger). The upside to this is no loose cords to fuss with, though adjustment will require zipping down the shell briefly to fine-tune the fit.

On the outside of the jacket, the Viv goes for the full compliment and integrates two Napoleon pockets, as well as two zippered hand pockets for the ultimate blend of storage and comfort. In terms of sizing, this shell certainly skews further toward the “ski” of ski mountaineering, and has a fairly roomy cut for getting insulation on board.

Made to do it all, the Viv Jacket from Mountain Hardwear is perfect for those with minimal closet space, or simply difficulty choosing exactly what they plan on getting into that day.

Check Price at BackcountryCheck Price at Mountain Hardwear

Hardshell Jacket Comparison Chart

Why You Should Trust Us

From the craggy tumbles of the Rockies to the snow-plastered granites of the Sierra, GearJunkie hosts a healthy number of alpine climbers, skiers, and mountaineers who know the sting of a bad turn in the weather — and how to guard against it. Our collective knowledge is brought together here to help guide your next hardshell jacket decision.

Senior Editor Nick Belcaster is the principal tester of this review, and resides beneath the sheer rise of the North Cascades of Washington State — the perfect test bed when seeking out both precipitous vertical relief and poor weather.

In addition, he has prepared and outfitted many alpine climbers setting out on expeditions in the grand ranges of the Karakoram, Alaska Range, and Andean Cordilleras — guiding their equipment choices to best prepare them for weeks spent under unkind elements.

He, along with a number of AMGA mountain guides, took to the mountains over a span of months to assess the worthiness of a spread of hardshell jackets, and we are confident that these are among the best available today.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose a Hardshell Jacket

When it comes to hardshell jackets, the beauty in having a shell that is simply tough is its utility across a number of different activities outdoors. We’ve worn our hardshells in everything from in-bounds resort skiing to ice climbing to braving storm swells in a dinghy. 

The flip side of this versatility, of course, is general confusion when it comes to deciding which hardshell jacket is right for you. Below we’ve dug into the nitty gritty and backed it up with science to untangle just what makes a hardshell jacket hard.  

We should note here the close cousins of the hardshell jacket — the softshell (or wind shell) jacket, as well as rain jackets. Hardshell jackets exist at the storm-battered fringe of the spectrum, where ultimate performance gives way to packability and weight. They often opt to add rather than subtract features, and prioritize ability in the mountains over all else.

If you’re looking for more ski styling, take a look at our Best Ski Jackets gear guide. And if ultimate performance is trumped by packability and versatility on your next outing, our Best Rain Jackets guide should steer you in the right direction. 

Waterproofness

Let’s rip the bandage off quickly here — given enough time, pressure, and wear, nothing is truly waterproof. But given new and novel advances in textile technology, hardshell jacket manufacturers can get dang close enough. To better understand this dance, a little science is warranted. 

Waterproofness is a measure of the amount of water that a fabric can resist before it yields and allows it to pass through. Testing of waterproofness has been standardized, and waterproof fabrics will be subjected to these tests over 24 hours to ensure longstanding resistance. These tests will produce a number known as the hydrostatic head of the fabric, with greater figures relaying a stronger resistance to water over the long term.

While rain jackets sport waterproof ratings between 5,000 and 20,000 mm, hardshell jackets will generally maintain a bare minimum of 20,000 mm waterproofing, with specialist membranes nearing the 30,000 mm mark. It is important to note that waterproofness and breathability are two metrics pulling in opposite directions of one another, and that superior water resistance will require some concessions in the breathability department.

• 5,000 mm: Where technical rain outerwear for outdoors adventures begins
• 5,000-10,000 mm: Waterproof under light rain or snow and no pressure
• 10,000-15,000 mm: Waterproof under many conditions, except under pressure
• 15,000-20,000 mm: Waterproof under heavy rain and snow
• >20,000 mm: Waterproof under heavy rain, snow, and pressure

When the rubber meets the road, the waterproofness of a hardshell jacket comes down to not only this rating, but also the interplay between fabric construction, DWR finishes, and design aspects such as a tight drawing hood or snug wrist cuffs.

Breathability

Not every moment in your hardshell is going to be a static shiver bivy, and during the times you’re grinding out vert in your jacket, you’ll be sweating. Our bodies do this in order to cool ourselves down, but without built-in ventilation in our hardshell jacket, that moisture has nowhere to go — and overheating can occur.

In order to circumvent this, modern waterproof fabrics incorporate a certain amount of breathability into the weave, which can also be measured. These numbers can be stacked against each other to give an idea of relative breathability between different hardshells.

MVTR and RET Testing

The Moisture Vapor Transmission Rate, or MVTR, has been the industry standard for some years when it comes to measuring the breathability of waterproof membranes. This rate can be measured through a number of different tests, but the most common metric used is given in g/m²/24 hours. Higher values on the MVTR test denote a better ability to pass moisture.

More budget-minded shells like the Rab Namche sport an MVTR rating of 17,000 g/m², which is a bit shy of the standard of 20,000 g/m² rating we like to see in jackets meant to be used during high-output activities. At the other end of the spectrum, specialized shells like The North Face Summit Torre Egger boast incredible values of 75,000 g/m².

The RET, or Resistance to Evaporation rating has been gaining steam in recent years, with the new GORE-TEX Pro membranes being notable adopters. This rating uses a simulated perspiration test, and values here are the inverse of the MVTR, with lower values showing a higher ability for moisture transfer. 

A jacket with a RET value of <6, such as the Mammut Nordwand Advanced HS Jacket, will really pump out perspiration and is rated as extremely breathable on the RET scale. Fabrics with a RET score of between 6 and 12 land in the highly breathable camp, and ratings of >12 are only moderately breathable. 

Waterproof Membranes

Waterproof membranes vary in their construction and claims, but all operate on a similar premise: keep rain from getting in, and keep perspiration moving out. Laminate membranes, like GORE-TEX, use an expanded film of specialty material known as polytetrafluoroethylene, or ePTFE, to accomplish this.

These ePTFE membranes have over 9 billion pores per square inch, each 20,000 times smaller than a water droplet, but 700 times larger than a water vapor molecule. This allows the membrane to resist water from the elements, but diffuse perspiration as it builds within the shell.

The other majority share of waterproof membranes are made using a very thin sheet of polyurethane, which is naturally hydrophilic and maintains breathability through diffusion. These membranes have historically been monolithic, meaning that they lack any pore structure, but new technologies are producing air-permeable membranes which pass air freely.

GORE-TEX Pro 2.0 

The pinnacle of high-performance waterproofing since 2007, GORE-TEX Pro has been the gold standard that many reach for when undeniable weather protection is needed. Whereas traditional 3-layer GORE-TEX requires a thin polyurethane lining to protect its membrane, the Pro version lines itself with a Micro-Grid backer, and is made of several ePTFE membranes bonded together.

Since 2020, GORE-TEX Pro has been available in three different technology flavors, which not only allows for a better application while retaining high waterproofness, but provides for hybrid designs across a jacket to best apply certain attributes where they are needed.

• Most Breathable: Better thought of as the ‘old’ Pro rolled forward, the Most Breathable variant utilizes lighter 30D face fabrics to bump up the membrane’s breathability to a RET score of <6 — and maintains the stellar 28,000 mm waterproof rating.
• Most Rugged: Made to be abused, jackets built with the Most Rugged technology use face fabrics from 70D to 200D to really stand up to abrasion. The breathability is inhibited a bit at a RET of <9, but this is still solidly within the highly breathable rank.
• Stretch: Able to stretch up to 12 to 20%, GORE-TEX Pro Stretch textiles can be used in areas of a jacket where mobility is key, such as between the shoulder blades or arms. The concession comes in terms of breathability, which comes in a RET value of <13.

GORE-TEX 3-Layer

The classic recipe; 3-layer GORE-TEX has been a reliable construction in hardshell jackets for years, utilizing a laminate of protective face fabric, ePTFE membrane, and lining. All 3-layer GORE-TEX membranes boast the same 28,000 mm waterproof rating and breathability of 17,000 g/m².

Toray Dermizax NX

Dermizax NX is a polyurethane-based waterproof membrane that touts impressive breathability numbers — up to 40,000 g/m² — but perhaps more impressively hasn’t had to cut waterproofness in order to do so. At a rated 20,000 mm, this membrane balances the scales well.

Proprietary Membranes

Recent years have seen an influx of proprietary membranes brewed up specifically for manufacturers, allowing them to tweak and fine-tune parameters to suit their use. 

The North Face’s FUTURELIGHT membrane is among the new and exciting air-permeable membranes that have begun to take hold of the market. This version utilizes “nanospinning” of polyurethane in order to create a matrix of the material that is big enough to allow air to pass, but also sized to prevent rain from making its way in. 

Other notable proprietary membranes used in hardshell jackets today include Patagonia’s H2No Standard Performance, as well as Helly Hansen’s LIFA Infinity Pro.

Fabric Layers and Face Fabrics

No waterproof membrane exists in a vacuum, and most all will require some protection on either side in order to work as designed. While 2- and 2.5-layer designs are common in rain jackets, most any hardshell jacket worth its salt will be made with 3-layer construction. 

This construction will include a waterproof membrane, as well as an interior textile backer to protect from body oils, and a face fabric to turn away abrasion and host a DWR finish.

Face Fabrics 

Combined with a hearty waterproof membrane, face fabrics are what make hardshell jackets truly hard. Ice and rock can chew up weaker shells with ease, so most hardshell jackets will be made with a thicker denier face fabric to shore up their overall durability. The expedition-ready Arc’teryx Alpha SV Jacket was the burliest contender in our showdown, with an impressive 100D face fabric.

Many hardshell jackets will use a hybrid face fabric design to gain the best of both worlds, opting for a more burly denier in high-wear areas such as the shoulders and sleeves, and using a lighter weave elsewhere to cut weight. In our testing, we found that an 80D/40D split was the most commonly used.

It’s important to note that face fabrics also play a large role in both breathability and waterproofing. The thicker a face fabric is, the more difficult it is to expel moisture, which is why some jackets like The North Face Summit Torre Egger use a lighter face fabric under the arms to really keep moisture moving.

Durable Water Repellent Finish (DWR)

Like the moat before the castle, a durable water-repellent finish is the first line of defense against rain ingress in a hardshell jacket. These hydrophobic applications are what cause the “duck’s back” look of a new rain jacket shedding water, and are important in protecting the waterproof membrane from being overwhelmed prematurely. 

DWR finishes also play an important role in maintaining the breathability of a hardshell. After extended use or pressure, water can push past the DWR and soak into the face fabric, creating a physical barrier that prevents perspiration from being expelled. Keeping your DWR finish fresh can help prevent this, as well as frequently cleaning your hardshell to rid it of body oils, sunscreens, and dirt.

While these finishes have been historically formulated with nasty perfluorochemicals, (also known as forever chemicals) some hardshell jacket manufacturers are leading the way toward a zero-PFC future. Currently, both the Patagonia Storm10 and Dual Aspect jackets are made without PFCs

Fit and Construction

Many of the hardshell jackets in our review sport an “alpine” fit, meaning that they have a bit more space than your typical rain jacket to accommodate more active insulation. Some, like the Ortovox 3L Ortler Jacket, are cut a bit more trim with the high output of ski-mountaineering in mind. Others still are a bit roomier for the other side of the ski equation, when you’ll want to be wearing all the insulation you’ll need for the day at once.

When considering how to size your hardshell jacket, aim for a comfortable fit when wearing all of the layers you’ll wear while on the move — such as a baselayer, active insulation fleece or synthetic jacket, and potentially a softshell jacket. You’ll want to have enough length in the sleeves to be able to make overhead swings of an ice tool without lifting the hem too much.

Most alpinists will opt not to size their hardshell to fit over their large parkas, as these are typically deployed when temps are below freezing, and any precipitation you might encounter will be drier snow instead of a soaking rain.

Finally, components like a long drop hem (the portion of the hem that covers your backside), ample sleeve cuffs, and a helmet-compatible hood greatly up the protection that a hardshell jacket provides. We found the Norrøna Trollveggen Pro Light to have the best execution of these features.

Alpine-Specific Features

Two-Way Front Zips

A two-way front zipper can be a major upside for those who spend a lot of time in a climbing harness, as it allows for the belay loop to pass through the shell without the need of tucking in the jacket hem. This can also be employed to increase ventilation during tough climbs.

Helmet-Compatible Hoods

Alpine climbing, mountaineering, and skiing all have their objective hazards, and you’ll want to wear a helmet to help mitigate those. A good hardshell jacket will accommodate for the extra space needed to wear one.

Climbing helmets are generally a bit lower profile than ski helmets, so ideally you should aim to try on your hardshell with your helmet to ensure there are no snug fit issues. Almost all hoods on hardshell jackets will include adjustable cords to fine-tune the fit.

Pit Zips

Ventilation in a shell jacket can be essential to avoiding overwhelming the breathability, and the best way to crack open the windows on a hardshell is through the pit zips. These zippers run beneath the arms and can be opened during times of high exertion to vent off perspiration, all without exposing the climber to the elements.

While most zips in our review open with a two-way closure, the Norrøna Trollveggen Pro Light impressed us with its novel ‘X-open’ design that places the zipper pulls at either side of the zipper, as opposed to running together. This prevented the openings from catching the wind like sails.

Pockets

Exterior pockets on hardshell jackets come in two designs: those made for hand warming, and those made for storage. Hand-warming pockets are less often employed on hardshell jackets, as the activities they are designed for often don’t leave much time for standing around. One notable exception is the Arc’teryx Beta AR, where a focus on versatility prompts their inclusion.

Exterior storage pockets, in our opinion, are much more important — and most often come in the form of ‘napoleon’ breast pockets. These pockets are accessed by reaching across the chest, and are placed above the fray of pack straps and harnesses for easy access.

Finally, consider the zippers of your hardshell jacket’s pockets. Almost all will feature some type of water-resistant zipper, although many will still employ storm flaps, which are folds of fabric that help resist water intrusion. 

Weight, Comfort, and Packability

A good hardshell jacket likely won’t be a welterweight champ, but advances in textile tech mean that hardshells are getting lighter and more packable as time goes on. A good example is the Arc’teryx Alpha SV: When this jacket debuted in 1998 it weighed in at 1 pound, 8 ounces, and today has trimmed half a pound off the trail weight.

Today, most hardshell jackets hover just north of the 1-pound mark, with some specialized shells like the Patagonia Storm10 coming in as low as 8.3 ounces — though at a protection tradeoff. At the opposite end of the spectrum are the feature-rich Stio Objective Pro and The North Face Summit Torre Egger jackets, which were some of the heavier shells.

The comfort of your hardshell shouldn’t be downplayed — not every adventure is going to be full-value, after all — and spending time in your hardshell can be made more enjoyable by a few niceties. High on our list is a microfiber lining on the inside of the collar, as well as a soft-to-the-touch jersey backer on the interior of the jacket.

And since you’ll need to stuff your shell jacket away at times, be mindful of overall packability. Most hardshell jackets won’t have an integrated stuff sack, but will fold well enough into their own hoods. Thinner denier face fabrics will have the edge over jackets made with extra burly weaves.

FAQ

What is the difference between hardshell and softshell jackets?

The difference between a hardshell and a softshell boils down to breathability and protection. Softshell jackets emphasize breathability, as well as being able to turn a stiff wind and help to retain body heat. Hardshell jackets are made to provide protection from the elements, and while they offer some breathability, they have a limit to how much they can handle.

Can you ski in a hardshell?

Absolutely! While ski-specific jackets are more finely tailored to the needs of skiers and snowboarders (generally a longer cut, with the potential inclusion of a powder skirt and wrist gaiters), a good hardshell jacket ticks all of the boxes needed for a day on the slopes or in the skin track.

It’s important to note that ski-focused hardshell jackets can be broken down even further in terms of the type of skiing you’re looking to do. If lift access and all-day laps are on the docket, a shell like the Stio Objective Pro Jacket will serve you well. And if you’re aiming to earn your turns, a more ski-mountaineering-styled shell like the Mountain Hardwear Viv or Ortovox 3L Ortler will do the trick.

Is anything better than GORE-TEX?

While GORE-TEX has been the de-facto ruler of the waterproof market since its invention, there are a number of different waterproof membranes of merit that emphasize different facets of the waterproof/breathable equation.

The robust waterproofing of an ePTFE membrane like GORE-TEX is undeniable, but the advent of air-permeable membranes that elevate breathability to previously unheard-of levels will be an attractive option for those who will be climbing or skiing without stopping.

What do you wear under a hardshell?

The beauty of a hardshell jacket is its interior volume for layered insulation. Under a hardshell, a  typical mountaineer or alpinist might wear something like this: A baselayer top or sun hoody, followed by a thin gridded fleece or synthetic fill active insulation piece. 

Because of the importance of keeping a waterproof membrane clean, we always attempt to wear long sleeves underneath our jackets, as body oils can clog the pores of a membrane.

Do hardshells keep you warm?

Hardshell jackets are not typically insulated, opting instead to allow climbers and skiers to add and subtract layers of insulation to fit their needs. But because a hardshell will limit the warmth-robbing effects of windchill, it will help retain the warmth you worked hard to create.

Are hardshell jackets windproof?

Due to their tough face fabrics, waterproof membranes, and full-coverage designs, hardshell jackets are certainly considered windproof. Some jackets, namely those that have air-permeable waterproof membranes, will pass slightly more wind than those made with monolithic membranes.

Should I size up for a hardshell jacket?

Hardshell jacket sizing typically takes into account that they are meant to be worn over active insulation, and will most often reflect the jacket size you most typically wear in outerwear. Sizing up a hardshell jacket can be an attractive option for those who require more protection, such as skiers, but for alpine climbers and mountaineers, this will often make for excess material.

Some manufacturers have earned a reputation for a specific type of fit, though we would warn against making broad assumptions when deciding on a hardshell based on these alone. Arc’teryx often produces jackets with a trimmer alpine fit, while jackets from Patagonia are a bit boxier. European brands such as Ortovox and Rab also tend to be a bit slimmer.

How long should a hardshell jacket last?

With proper upkeep and care, we’ve had hardshell jackets that have lasted 5-6 years before needing to be retired to light duty, and you can likely expect to get the same out of most modern jackets today. Keeping a jacket clean is a surprisingly large part of extending its longevity.

Because ePTFE membranes are degraded by oils, things like sweat and sunscreen can greatly limit their ability to do their job. You should do all you can to avoid introducing these contaminants into your hardshell jacket membrane, including wearing long-sleeve baselayers underneath your shell jackets.

You should also expect to refresh the DWR finish of your jacket multiple times over its lifespan, which will return its water resistance to near-new levels. On the hardshells we use consistently, we attempt to refresh the finish twice a year — once in the fall before ski season starts, and once before summer begins.

How do I keep my hardshell jacket clean?

Keeping a hardshell clean is an important part of maintaining its functionality — on two fronts. Body oils can clog membranes from the interior of a jacket, while a worn DWR finish can lead to premature wetting out and limit overall breathability.

In order to clean a hardshell, begin by washing the jacket in an outerwear-safe solution such as Nikwax Tech Wash.

Because applying a DWR finish to the interior of a hardshell would limit the membrane’s ability to pass moisture, we don’t recommend wash-in types of DWRs, but instead spray-on varieties such as Nikwax TX.Direct Spray On or GEAR AID DWR Spray. Liberally mist the exterior of the damp jacket fabric, paying extra attention to high-wear areas such as the wrist cuffs, shoulders, and back.

Finally, turn the jacket inside-out and zip it closed, which will keep the finish from rubbing off in your drier. Set your drier to low heat and tumble dry, which will set the finish.

How do I choose a hardshell jacket?

Choosing a hardshell jacket can be a daunting task — certainly so for outdoors folks who enjoy multiple disciplines and want a jacket that can cover them in most situations. We suggest considering the objectives that you’ll be spending the most time in. Will you be plodding up glaciers to access the summits of volcanos? Swinging tools at Hyalite? Flying into a remote gorge for a skiing objective? Each of these demands a certain type of hardshell, and while most will do some of everything, there are specialist jackets that will excel where others may be just serviceable.

(photo/Erika Courtney)

” data-medium-file=”https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/03/DSC7507-300×201.jpg” data-large-file=”https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/03/DSC7507-700×468.jpg” />

Apparel

The Best Rain Jackets of 2023

Whether you’re splashing about town or trekking through a monsoon, these are the best rain jackets of 2023.

Gear Tester Sean McCoy putting the Arc’teryx Sabre AR Jacket through its paces at Crested Butte; (photo/Jason Hummel)

” data-medium-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2022/10/DSC02447-copy-300×200.jpg” data-large-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2022/10/DSC02447-copy-700×467.jpg” />

Apparel

The Best Ski Jackets of 2023

Whether you’re skiing or snowboarding in sunny or stormy conditions, here are our top picks for the longest-lasting, protective, comfortable jackets to keep you outside…

The post The Best Hardshell Jackets of 2023 appeared first on GearJunkie.

Thanks to advancements in fabric technology and design, today’s running shorts are better than ever. Overall, materials are lighter, more comfortable, and offer better mobility.

All running shorts should allow you to move freely — that’s a given. The best running shorts, however, should not only provide freedom of movement, but also keep moisture at a minimum to ward off chafing, and keep items like your phone, keys, and fuel secure without bouncing around.

After months of testing, even years in some cases, we’ve managed to narrow down the best of the best for whatever type of running you’re into. The shorts on this list are the ones we kept reaching for time and time again.

If you’re interested in broadening your knowledge about running shorts, check out our comprehensive buyer’s guide and FAQ sections at the end of this article. And be sure to look at our comparison chart when it’s decision time.

The Best Running Shorts for Men of 2023

• Best Overall Running Shorts: REI Co-Op Swiftland Running Shorts
• Best Budget Running Shorts: Baleaf 5″ Running Athletic Shorts
• Runner-up Best Running Shorts: Tracksmith Session Short
• Best Pockets on Running Shorts: Black Diamond Sprint Shorts
• Best Shorts for Trail Running: Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts
• Best Half Tight Running Shorts: Nike Dri-FIT ADV AeroSwift
• Best Split Running Shorts: SOAR Race Short 5.0

Best Overall Running Shorts

REI Co-Op Swiftland Running Shorts

Specs

• Length 5″ and 7″
• Shell 73% nylon, 27% spandex; Bluesign approved
• Liner Brief (80% nylon, 20% spandex; Bluesign approved)
• Pockets 1 rear zipper, 2 side drop-ins

Pros

• Extremely lightweight and airy
• Secure, bounce-free main pocket
• Next-to-nothing feeling

Cons

• Small zippered pocket opening

Cory Smith

This is the second iteration of REI-branded running shorts that we’ve tested, and we have to give a hats-off to the design team — these are top-notch running shorts. Offered in both a 5-inch and 7-inch inseam, the REI Co-Op Swiftland running shorts ($55) checked all the boxes that we look for in a quality pair of running shorts — comfortable, supportive, and moisture-wicking with plenty of carrying capacity.

The 73% nylon and 27% spandex shell is remarkably light and airy with excellent mobility. Not once was the stretchy fabric confining. The shorts pretty much felt unnoticeable, and the brief-style liner was comfortable, offering a good amount of support without feeling restrictive.

A wide but comfortable waistband securely anchors the shorts around your waist. The rear zip pocket on the waistband is capable of holding a smartphone, and two drop-in side pockets can hold snacks or keys — all bounce-free.

If we had to nitpick, one concern is their long-term durability. Take this with a grain of salt, as we haven’t put them through a long-term durability test yet. We only mention this because the shell fabric is really thin — much thinner than most of the shorts tested — and they softened up a bit with each wash cycle.

We’d also like to see the rear zippered pocket have a slightly larger opening. It took a little force to stuff a large Samsung smartphone in the pocket, and we could certainly imagine busting a seam trying to fit it in if you’re not careful.

It’s clear REI put a lot of thought into these shorts. No matter what type of running you do, whether it’s road, trail, or track, everything about these is designed for comfort and functionality — you’ll put them on and forget about them. They’ll work for beginners and elite runners alike, and we’re confident you’ll appreciate having them in your drawer.

Check Price at REI

Best Budget Running Shorts

Baleaf 5″ Running Athletic Shorts

Specs

• Length 5″ and 7″
• Shell 89.7% polyester, 10.3% spandex
• Liner Brief (91.7% polyester, 8.3% spandex)
• Pockets 1 rear zippered

Pros

• Well-priced
• Stretchy

Cons

• Baggy

Cory Smith

If you’re looking for well-priced running shorts for basic running and gym sessions, the Baleaf 5″ Running Athletic Shorts ($22) will provide the most bang for your buck. There’s nothing particularly special about them — they just work.

The shell is extremely lightweight with a moderate amount of stretch, and the liner provides a moderate amount of support and adequate comfort for short outings. The rear-zip pocket was one of the largest tested, easily fitting a super-large smartphone, but it did bounce a bit more than other shorts.

We could go down a long list of features we’d like to see, but for under 20 bucks, we wouldn’t expect them anyway. The biggest knock is fit. They size extremely large and baggy, nearly two sizes too big.

If you’re typically a large, go at least to a medium — maybe even a small. If you struggle to find running shorts with enough volume, these should work really well for you.

If you’re doing any amount of volume, we’d steer toward other shorts listed here. But if you’re not picky on the finer details and just need a pair of treadmill shorts, or shorts for quick, hassle-free runs, these shorts are for you.

Check Price at Amazon

Runner-up Best Running Shorts

Tracksmith Session Short

Specs

• Length 5″
• Shell 86% nylon, 14% elastane
• Liner Brief (89% polyester, 11% spandex)
• Pockets 1 rear zipper

Pros

• Unbelievably comfortable
• Polygiene anti-odor, antimicrobial treated
• Great for post-run outings

Cons

• Somewhat heavyweight fabric compare to others tested

Cory Smith

Imagine taking the most comfortable pair of sweatpants (or shorts, for that matter) and infusing them with a highly technical moisture-wicking fabric. That only begins to paint the picture of how comfortable the Tracksmith Session Shorts ($68) are.

The lightweight four-way stretch nylon and elastane blend shell is freaking amazing. Beyond running, these are the type of shorts ideal for lounging around the house in. As a bonus, they’re Polygiene anti-odor, antimicrobial treated.

While these are one of the most comfortable running shorts we’ve tested, we wouldn’t wear them on race day or on a big mountain run. Instead, we’d want something that’s more lightweight and with better pockets. Speaking of pockets, while the rear pocket will fit a phone, it takes a little work to shove it through the small zippered opening, which we wish was a little larger.

Still, these shorts have a place in every runner’s rotation based on comfort alone. If you ever find yourself with a social event after a run or workout, these are the perfect shorts for the occasion. With eight colors to choose from, you’re bound to find a pair to match your shirt.

For comfort and functionality from the track to the pub, these are some of the best running shorts available.

Check Price at Tracksmith

Best Pockets on Running Shorts

Black Diamond Sprint Shorts

Specs

• Length 5″ and 7″
• Shell 88% nylon, 12% elastane w/DWR
• Liner Brief (100% polyester)
• Pockets 2 rear zippered, 3 drop-in

Pros

• Well-designed pockets
• Wind-resistant shell is great for mountain running
• Comfortable waistbelt

Cons

• Retains moisture more than most

Cory Smith

Let’s be clear — most of us hate carrying stuff when we run. It feels restricting, off-balance, and slower. Many of us will go out of our way to avoid wearing a hydration vest or waist belt. If you have similar feelings, you’ll love the Black Diamond Sprint Shorts ($90). These shorts are our go-to for light and fast mountain runs.

When we don’t feel like being bogged down wearing a vest or belt, but still need to carry the typical items like water, fuel, an emergency shell, and phone, these are our go-to shorts. The thick but well-vented waistband with a drawstring provides a secure foundation for five pockets: three drop-in pockets and two rear zipper pockets.

These shorts can easily carry a phone, 500mL soft flask, emergency wind shell, and enough fuel for over 3 hours with a dedicated pocket for trash. We were highly impressed with how supportive and comfortable the polyester liner felt, even when the waist pockets were stuffed.

While the stretch nylon plain-weave face shell is durable as hell, it’s terrible at wicking and retaining moisture. On really hot days the DWR-treated shell became absolutely drenched with sweat, retaining the moisture and feeling a bit like heavy swim trunks.

You may want to opt for shorts with better breathability on steamy runs. But on chilly, windy days, the DWR-treated shell acted much like a wind shell, blocking the wind better than any other shorts we’ve tested. With exceptional storage and wind protection, the BD Sprint Shorts are ideal for high alpine mountain running.

Check Price at Black DiamondCheck Price at Backcountry

Best Shorts for Trail Running

Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts

Specs

• Length 5” and 7″
• Shell 90% recycled polyester, 10% spandex
• Liner Brief (100% Recycled polyester double knit)
• Pockets One rear zipper, four envelope enclosure drop-in

Pros

• Newly added four-way stretch
• Carrying capacity
• Comfortable waistline

Cons

• Expensive
• Sizing is finicky

Cory Smith

The Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts were a huge hit when they first came out. They were comfortable, mobile, and had enormous carrying capacity. Then, a few years back, Patagonia updated the Strider Pro, and fans went wild ripping the updated shorts for being too tight, lacking mobility, and having poor durability. 

We’re pleased to report that Patagonia has once again updated its flagship running shorts, and we can confidently say that this is their best version yet. Patagonia replaced the tough, non-stretchy DWR coated 100% recycled polyester with 90% recycled polyester blended with 10% four-way stretch spandex. That little bit of spandex and dropping the DWR made all the difference. The new shell is soft and offers excellent mobility. These shorts are night and day compared to the previous version. 

The waist belt remains largely unchanged, with four drop-in pockets and one rear zipper. It’s not too thin or thick and maintains comfort when the drawcord is tight. In the previous version, we couldn’t fit our phone in the rear zip, but we were pleased to find out an iPhone 14 Pro just fit with a little work getting it in and out. 

In terms of sizing, we found it fit larger, as our one lead tester wore a medium in the previous version, but the small seemed to fit better and offer better support in the HeiQ Pure odor control brief.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Patagonia

Best Half Tight Running Shorts

Nike Dri-FIT ADV AeroSwift

Specs

• Length Above the knee
• Shell 89% polyester, 11% spandex
• Liner Brief (89% polyester, 11% spandex)
• Pockets 1 rear zippered, 4 drop-in

Pros

• Built-in liner
• Lightweight
• Comfortable

Cons

• Ribbed material takes getting used to

Cory Smith

For complete mobility and freedom, there is no better type of running shorts than half tights. Most tights either really tight and restrictive or somewhat loose-fitting that ride up. The Dri-FIT ADV AeroSwift ($85) falls perfectly in the middle — almost like you’re not wearing anything.

Nike describes them as “buttery smooth,” and we have to agree. The 89% polyester and 11% spandex shell is soft and supple, and they have a built-in brief liner for added support. Four drop-in pockets around the waist are perfect for fuel, car keys, or a credit card, while a zippered rear pocket fits most modern smartphones.

If you’re looking for compression tights, these are not it. The material is way too light and thin to provide any type of compression, and the ribbed face is quite unique. We weren’t initially huge fans, but the supple feel grew on us after further testing.

Running tights are somewhat of an acquired taste, but in the right application, they are far better than running shorts. The best use is when it’s cold and rainy. Wet shorts can get heavy in a downpour and start to feel cumbersome. Tights, on the other hand, stay put when wet and won’t feel as heavy. They also keep your quads and hamstrings warmer on chilly days.

If you’re an avid runner who doesn’t let the weather hold you back, give these a try.

Check Price at Nike

Best Split Running Shorts

SOAR Race Shorts 5.0

Specs

• Length 2.5”
• Shell 60% Polyester, 40% Elastane
• Liner Brief-style (78% Polyester, 22% Elastane)
• Pockets Two minimal key pockets

Pros

• Outstanding mobility
• Stylish
• Durable

Cons

• Extremely pricey
• Small pockets are limiting

Cory Smith

A good split short should drape over your legs with the splits down the side, allowing the shorts to open freely without restriction or riding up as you lift your thighs while running. A quality pair of split shorts is pure freedom. SOAR, a UK-based boutique running brand, executes this perfectly with their premier performance Race Shorts 5.0 ($125). Every element was designed for performance down to the perforated waist belt, aggressive-looking notched side split, and even the logo placement. 

The 4-way stretch French fabric shell is remarkably thin and very stretchy. At only 70g for a men’s medium, they are by far the lightest shorts we tested. The shorts felt unnoticeable and airy as our track tester ripped 400s around their local track. To keep the weight to a minimum, SOAR had to skimp on pockets, and there are only two internal drop-in pockets along the waist. 

Let’s address the elephant in the room — the price. $125 is a lot of money for running shorts, especially a pair of split shorts. For what it’s worth, after wearing split shorts for over 25 years, we haven’t found another pair that even comes close to the fit, functionality, and styling of the SOAR Race Shorts 5.0. These are by far the most durable split shorts we’ve tested. Our lead tester had the previous version for over 5 years now, and they look just as good as they were on day one. 

If you can get past the price, you’ll be rewarded with one of the best pairs of split shorts you can own. If you thrive off an all-eyes-on-me attitude on race day and want to look and feel like an elite runner, these are for you.

Check Price at Soar

Best of the Rest

Saxx Hightail

Specs

• Length 5″
• Shell 100% polyester
• Liner Compression mesh liner: (85% nylon, 15% elastane)
• Pockets 1 rear drop-in

Pros

• Extremely supportive liner
• Comfortable

Cons

• Heavy
• Can’t carry a phone

Cory Smith

If you’re not familiar with SAXX underwear, boy, are you missing out. Their claim to fame is something called the Ballpark Pouch, a built-in soft, supportive pouch for your boys. This unique design keeps your parts securely and comfortably tucked away and free from rubbing.

The Hightail 2-in-1 ($68) basically takes their award-winning underwear and wraps a moisture-wicking polyester stretch running shell on top. The Ballpark Pouch design works especially well when running. It’s more supportive than any other brief or liner, and it layers in extra prevention around your male parts.

Overall, we would have liked to see better pockets in these shorts. There’s one rear drop-in pocket that’s large enough to hold a few gels and a key, but not a phone. One really smart feature is the built-in key string to prevent your key from accidentally falling out when accessing items. We wish more companies would do this.

If you struggle with any kind of chafing, whether it be between the legs or around your male anatomy, or if you’re simply looking for a more supportive hold, the Hightail is by far one of the best-fitting running shorts we’ve tested.

Check Price At Saxx

Ten Thousand Far Short

Specs

• Length 5″
• Shell 88% recycled polyester, 12% spandex
• Liner Brief (90% recycled nylon, 10% elastane)
• Pockets 1 rear zippered, 1 drop-in

Pros

• Breathable shell
• Comfortable waistband

Cons

• Expensive

Cory Smith

Ten Thousand is one of many fitness-oriented apparel brands that has recently branched out to the running category. We’ve been skeptical a bit about gym-oriented fitness brands making running apparel, but Ten Thousand nailed it with the Far Shorts ($78).

Designed in collaboration with ultra-endurance athlete Rich Roll, the Far Short holds its own against some of the best running shorts we’ve tested. The shell fabric is thin and stretchy, and it does a fantastic job of not only wicking moisture but also drying quickly.

Of all the waistbands tested, these were the most comfortable. The rear pocket is built closer to the waistline, which not only easily fit a cell phone, but it also did a great job of assuring it didn’t bounce.

The downside is that boutique brands typically cost more, and the Ten Thousand Far Shorts are no exception. If it’s any consolation, we can confirm the quality is on par with the price. If longevity and functionality are your primary concerns, these running shorts are certainly worth the money.

Check Price at ten thousand

HOKA Glide Short

Specs

• Length 5″ and 7″
• Shell 89% recycled polyester, 11% elastane
• Liner Brief
• Pockets 1 rear folded-over drop-in, 1 side zippered

Pros

• Extremely lightweight shell
• Comfortable
• Wicks moisture well

Cons

• Odd designed pocket is tough to use
• Can’t fit phone

Cory Smith

We have to give HOKA credit. Despite being relatively new to running apparel, the brand makes a damn good running short. These Glide shorts ($60-64) are light, airy, and have a very nice flow to them when running. The 89% recycled polyester and 11% elastane shell has a good amount of stretch, allowing for excellent mobility.

The waistband is well-made and comfortable. The internal brief liner is one of the more supportive ones tested. While our lead tester typically wear s a small, he opted for a medium and is glad he did, as it provided a more relaxed fit.

Our one gripe is the pocket design. It comes with a small side zippered pocket and one rear elastic pocket. The rear pocket has a unique design where it’s doubled layered (folded over itself) — perhaps to prevent items from falling out — which it certainly does well.

The issue with this design is twofold. First, it’s impossible to fit a phone, and second, it makes it harder to grab items out. That said, these shorts performed exceptionally well otherwise.

Check Price at Hoka

Smartwool Merino Sport Lined 5″ Short

Specs

• Length 5″ and 7″
• Shell 86% recycled polyester, 14% elastane
• Liner Brief (54% merino wool, 46% polyester)
• Pockets 1 side zippered, 1 drop-in

Pros

• Extremely supportive liner
• Wool liner wards off odor well

Cons

• Heavy shell is not ideal for really hot days

Cory Smith

We are huge fans of wool as a performance fabric. There’s no other material that wicks and dissipates sweat better. Now, we know what you’re probably thinking — and no, these shorts ($65) aren’t entirely made of wool — just the internal brief.

Smartwool uses Merino 150 sport for the brief, including lining the inside of the waistband as well. These shorts fit great and are supportive, and we can attest to their odor resistance.

The shell is made with a recycled polyester and elastane blend that moves freely. The only downside is that they’re thicker than most of the other shorts tested.

Much to the surprise of most people, wool is a great summertime fabric because it has natural temperature regulation properties. That being said, it’s certainly not as cool as other fabrics. Overall, these are a great pair of shorts for mild summer days or a run/gym hybrid workout.

Check price at REICheck Price at Evo

On Lightweight Shorts

Specs

• Length 5″
• Shell Front fabric: 86% recycled polyamide, 14% elastane; Back mesh: 100% recycled polyester
• Liner Brief (89% polyester, 11% elastane)
• Pockets One rear drop-in

Pros

• Supportive brief liner
• Great mobility
• Dual fabric shell is protective in the front and breathable in the back

Cons

• Only one pocket
• Expensive

Cory Smith

While On running shoes seem to get all the attention these days with their unique-looking soles, their apparel often gets overlooked and is just as, if not more, impressive. One of their better pieces of apparel we’ve tested is the On Lightweight Running Shorts ($80).

These lightweight shorts use a stretchy but durable PFC-free DWR recycled polyamide and elastane fabric on the front and airy recycled polyester mesh for the back. This dual-fabric design is both functional and fashionable. The DWR front blocks wind and wards off moisture, while the breathable mesh on the back of the legs allows for excellent ventilation. 

Offered in a five-inch inseam only, we found the shorts offered outstanding mobility with no restriction. If you’re looking for a snug-fitting integrated brief, the liner offers the best support of any shorts we tested. Our fussy tester, who normally wears a separate brief for added support, found he could comfortably skip the added brief.

The shorts have a thick 2-inch waistband that sits comfortably against the skin with a large drop-in back pocket that easily stows an iPhone 14 Pro. However, we did have a couple of gripes regarding the waist belt. For starters, the rear drop-in pocket is the only pocket, so if you want to carry multiple items, that’s your only option. We also found the waist belt elastic was rather weak, so we needed to tighten the drawstring for additional support while carrying our phones.

Check price at REICheck price at On

Vuori Course Run Shorts

Specs

• Length 5”
• Shell 50% Recycled Polyester, 42% Polyester, 8% Elastane
• Liner Boxer Brief
• Pockets One rear drop-in, one side leg drop-in on internal boxer brief

Pros

• Very comfortable
• Can easily double as gym shorts

Cons

• Pricey
• The relaxed fit will feel baggy for thin runners

Cory Smith

Vuori makes some of the best workout apparel and these shorts are no exception. New this season, Vuori Course Run Shorts ($78) are made with a recycled polyester, polyester, and elastane blend. The 4-way stretch fabric is buttery smooth against the skin and does a great job of wicking moisture. 

Of all the shorts we tested, these and the Tracksmith Session shorts offered the best blend of run performance with post-run styling and comfort. Underneath the lightweight woven shell is a lightly perforated boxer brief with a drop-in pocket on the left leg. 

Vuori advertises the side leg pocket as a phone pocket, but we couldn’t fit an iPhone 14 Pro. Instead, we found the rear drop-in pocket along the waistline offered a secure and bounce-free spot for our phone, while the leg pocket was best for credit cards, cash, or fuel. 

The shorts have somewhat of a baggy, relaxed fit that favors those with a thicker waistline and big thighs and quads. Our slimmer tester, who prefers short three-inch running shorts, felt like he was swimming in the excess fabric throughout his run.

Check Price at REI

Janji AFO Middle Shorts

Specs

• Length 3” and 5″
• Shell 88% recycled polyester, 12% elastane
• Liner Brief (94% polyester, 6% spandex)
• Pockets One rear zipper, one internal; drop-in w/ bungee cord

Pros

• Extremely lightweight
• Fast drying time
• Bungee securely attaches keys
• 14 colors to choose from

Cons

• Some may find them too short

Cory Smith

The Janji AFO Middle Shorts ($64) are as close as you’ll get to a next-to-nothing feeling from a pair of five-inch running shorts. Made with an ultra-thin recycled polyester and elastane blend shell, these were the shorts we kept reaching for during the hottest of days. Even when they were sweat-drenched, the shorts didn’t feel bogged down and, in direct sunlight, they dried quicker than most shorts we tested. 

Offered in both a three and five-inch inseam, our tester found them to run on the shorter side of five-inch running shorts. Still, thanks to a mild amount of stretch, they never felt constricting. The brief liner offers a decent amount of support and hold for such a lightweight pair of shorts. 

The shorts come with two pockets, a rear-zip pocket that barely fits an iPhone 14 Pro, and an internal drop-in pocket along the waist for cards, cash, or keys. One of the more brilliant features is the bungee cord that allows you to store your keys securely, so it’s impossible to lose them while running. 

If you’re looking for a comfortable, lightweight pair of running shorts for hot, humid weather, you’re not going to find too many as good as these.

Check Price at REI

New Balance Accelerate 5-Inch Short

Specs

• Length 5” and 7″
• Shell 55% recycled polyester, 45% polyester
• Liner Brief (Unknown)
• Pockets Two drop-in hip, two side hand pockets

Pros

• Great pricepoint
• Great multi-use shorts for gym, hiking, etc.

Cons

• Lack of stretch
• No secure pocket for phone

Cory Smith

If you’re looking for a good pair of running shorts that won’t break the bank, the New Balance Accelerate 5-Inch Short gives you everything you need and nothing you don’t — all for $35. Made with a polywoven fabric that’s 55% recycled polyester, the shell features NB DRY fast-drying technology, and we were impressed with its wicking and fast drying times. 

The downside is that there isn’t any spandex or elastane blend, which means the fabric has no stretch. However, the shorts have a fuller fit to compensate for the lack of stretch. While they’re certainly not as comfortable as more expensive shorts, they have good mobility. 

Two side hand pockets don’t secure items enough for running but are great for carrying stuff to the gym where it can be stowed elsewhere. For carrying small items like a credit card or some cash while running the shorts have two drop-in hip pockets.

Check Price at AmazonCheck Price at New Balance

Rab Talus Trail Shorts

Specs

• Length 7″
• Shell 86% polyamide, 14% elastane.
• Liner Boxer brief (85% polyamide, 15% elastane)
• Pockets one rear zipper, on an extra-large front drop-in, one tiny internal waist drop-in, and one side leg drop in pocket

Pros

• High-performance material
• Comfortable waistline

Cons

• Expensive
• Heavy items in pockets will bounce around

Cory Smith

Based out of the UK, Rab has quickly become one of our favorite mountain apparel brands. The fabric is the best part of the shorts, which won us over. Rab’s Matrix fabric is phenomenal for any high-powered activity, such as running, hiking, or climbing.

The Talus Trail Shorts ($95) feature Matrix Aero, the lightest, fastest-drying version of Matrix. On the trails, the high-stretch fabric felt virtually unnoticeable. 

The waist belt is one of the most comfortable we tested. It’s thick with mild compression and tons of space to carry fuel and an emergency layer. There’s an extra large front mesh drop-in pocket for easy access with the ability to carry long items that don’t fit in most running shorts. 

While we prefer a brief style liner, the boxer brief was comfortable and features silicone grip dots to prevent it from riding up. The Trail Talus Light is a shorter inseam version with a brief liner. 

That said, there are a couple of areas where we think these shorts could be improved. For starters, while we found the waist belt extremely comfortable, it doesn’t have a drawcord. This caused a lot of bouncing around when carrying multiple items in the waist belt pockets, especially heavier items like a phone.

In general, we don’t recommend buying these if you want to carry your phone in your shorts. Like most European companies, the fit is much slimmer than US apparel. Our slim 5’8″ tester with a 29-inch waist fell between a small and medium, but ultimately sized up.

Check Price at BackcountryCheck Price at Rab

Running Shorts Comparison Chart

Why You Should Trust Us

Cory Smith has been a runner since 1992. He’s a full-time running coach who has been reviewing running gear since 2014. In addition to running shorts, he covers road running shoes and GPS watches, and he writes training articles for GearJunkie.

To find the best running shorts, we start with hours of online research. We attend trade shows such as The Running Event and Outdoor Retailer for newly released shorts, such as the SAXX Hightail, and keep our eye out for up-and-coming brands like Ten Thousand.

For this test, our research resulted in over 20 pairs of running shorts tested. We then conducted a thorough field test to evaluate each short on fit, comfort, mobility, moisture-wicking, and carrying capacity. Testing locations included up and down the coast of California as well as trails in Mammoth Lakes, Moab, and Seattle.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose Running Shorts

It can be hard to sort through what’s really important when finding a pair of running shorts. To help, here are the key things you need to know about running shorts.

Material

Running shorts follow the same rules as every other technical sports apparel — moisture-wicking fabric is a must. The two most predominant are polyester and nylon blends.

I prefer shorts that have a blend of stretch fabrics such as spandex or elastane in them. This gives the shorts greater flexibility and mobility, ultimately limiting restriction.

Higher percentages of these flexible fabrics do have a downside — they tend to absorb and retain more moisture. Moisture-ridden fabric and poor fit are the top causes of chafing.

If chafing is an issue for you, pay attention to the fabric and look for a pair of shorts that has a slightly different makeup. Half tights and 2-in-1s are great options for between-the-leg chafing protection.

Inseam Length

The inseam indicates how far down the leg the short sits. It measures the length from the crotch to the end of the shorts and usually comes in 3-inch, 5-inch, and 7-inch options.

Most of the shorts tested, with the exception of the 3-inch version, come in both a 5-inch and 7-inch option. The ideal inseam length is as much a matter of personal preference as whether you enjoy running road, track, or trail. However, the 5-inch option seems to be the most popular.

Short shorts, such as a 3-inch inseam, are often known as split shorts and tend to be the coolest and least restrictive. Longer shorts such as the 5-inch or 7-inch version are our go-to when traveling because of their all-purpose versatility, easily doubling as gym shorts, hiking shorts, or even swimming shorts.

Liners & Shells

Most running shorts have two layers: an outer shell and an inner liner. The inner liner’s primary focus is built-in support and is either a mesh brief or spandex-type compression tight, called a 2-in-1.

If you’re someone who struggles with between-the-legs chafing, we recommend looking at a 2-in-1 short such as the SAXX Hightail or a half tight like the Nike. Having a built-in quarter-length compression liner will protect your legs from rubbing together.

The outer shell is always made with some sort of moisture-wicking material such as polyester, nylon, or wool. Some are treated with DWR to help repel water. DWR-treated shorts great for wind protection, but they can absorb and hold moisture longer than non-DWR-treated shorts.

Most shorts these days will blend in a stretchy fabric such as spandex or elastane to give the shorts extra mobility. If you struggle with finding shorts that fit properly or experience shorts riding up, we recommend you look for shorts with spandex and/or elastane.

Pockets

If you want to carry items such as your phone, keys, or fuel during your run, you’ll want a pair of shorts with pockets. Look for shorts with pockets that are close to the waistline. The tension used to hold the shorts up serves as a great anchor point to prevent them from bouncing around as you run.

Shorts with a thicker waistline and/or 2-in-1s are better at holding items tightly against your waist. Pockets with zippers are ideal for storing keys, credit cards, and your phone.

How many pockets you need depends on what you want to carry. However, there is a tipping point where you’ll want to start using a vest or waist belt to hold your items.

It’s a good idea to invest in at least one pair of shorts with a large carry capacity like the Black Diamond Sprint. These are great for runs when you’re traveling and may need to carry more items than usual.

FAQ

(Photo/Asics)

” data-medium-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2021/12/Best-Road-Running-Shoes-300×200.jpg” data-large-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2021/12/Best-Road-Running-Shoes-700×467.jpg” />

Footwear

The Best Running Shoes of 2022

We tested the best running shoes of 2022 with options for every budget. Top picks include HOKA, Brooks, and more!

Apparel

The Best Running Hats of 2023

Whether pounding the pavement or hitting the trail, we’ve found the best running hats for every use and budget.

The post The Best Running Shorts for Men of 2023 appeared first on GearJunkie.

Let’s face it — brands design most camping chairs with functionality in mind, not aesthetics. When I think of a camping chair, the image that pops into my head is one of mesh and metal, with maybe a cupholder or two. Sound familiar? 

A camping chair’s aesthetics might not be important when you just need to throw it in a vehicle for setup at a campsite. But the REI Co-op Wonderland Chair is a welcome break from the norm. 

Over the past few weeks, I enjoyed sitting porch-side with this camping chair drinking evening cocktails just as much as I enjoyed taking it on car camping trips.

In short: Most of the time, my camp chairs sit gathering cobwebs in a shed until I need them. But the Wonderland chair ($100) can bridge the gap between the campground and the patio. It’s a well-designed chair you’ll actually want to integrate into your outdoor furniture, making it worth its higher price tag.

Read on to find out more about the pros and cons of the new Wonderland chair from REI.

REI Co-op Wonderland Chair

Specs

• Weight 7 lbs., 13 oz.
• Dimensions 21” x 24” x 35”
• Cupholders One that swivels out under right armrest
• Pockets None
• Weight capacity 300 lbs.

Pros

• Design-forward
• Versatile
• Comfortable, high seat

Cons

• Bulky
• Heavy
• Expensive

Miya Tsudome

check price at rei

The Wonderland is similar to the REI Outward Lawn Chair, which REI describes as “the chair from your childhood, but way more durable.” Unpacking the Wonderland chair, I felt the same way. Its wide seat and sturdy armrests reminded me of those beach chairs made with crisscrossed webbing that would imprint onto your bare legs and get threadbare and weather-beaten over time. The Wonderland is a much more attractive version, with its polyester ripstop seat in pastel colors and glazed wooden armrests. 

It’s clear that REI made this chair with high-quality materials. Its recycled seat fabric has a durable water-repellent finish, allowing it to stand up to the elements. Its coated aluminum frame keeps the total weight down. And the chair feels overall sturdy and well-constructed, even boasting a 300-pound weight capacity.

The Best Camping Chairs of 2023

We found and tested the best camping chairs for every use and budget. Top picks include REI, ALPS, Coleman, and more. Read more…

Although the seat has no extra padding, this chair remains very comfortable. The seat itself is wide with tightly stretched fabric, allowing for good weight distribution. And it doesn’t sag in the middle. Its 16-inch high back allows you to feel fully supported as you lean back and kick your feet up. 

Weighing in at 7 pounds 13 ounces, the Wonderland isn’t the lightest camp chair on the market and is arguably on the cumbersome side of the spectrum. You won’t want to throw it into a packed-to-the-gills car as an afterthought on your way to go camping. You’ll want to plan on having the space to bring it.

This chair collapses onto itself easily, with the assistance of a tensioned strap on the back that doubles as a shoulder strap for easy transport. You wouldn’t want to carry this chair over a long distance, though. The strap isn’t padded, and carrying it can be awkward. The Outward Lawn Chair is definitely easier to transport with its included backpack straps. And I was kind of bummed to see this feature removed in the new Wonderland chair.

I used this chair for over a few weeks, and it moved around from my porch to my backyard, getting compliments from any friends who came over and took a seat. It’s a stylish chair, and I loved that it could be just as at home in my backyard as it was at a campsite.

When sitting in the Wonderland at a campground, I appreciated the cupholder that swivels out from below the seat. And the lack of mesh made my rear end less cold in the winter evenings. But this is a consideration for the hotter months, where campers might prefer a mesh seat for breathability.

REI Co-op Wonderland Chair: Conclusion

The new Wonderland Chair from REI Co-op is a slightly upgraded version of the Outward Lawn Chair. With a different collapsing and carrying method, as well as a new included cupholder, the Wonderland will appeal to those who want a versatile chair they can deploy quickly and easily on their next overnight.

This chair is great for folks who want to get the most bang for their buck, and have a camping chair for lounging on the patio with friends or sitting around a solo stove in the backyard without sacrificing style. This chair is heavy and not made to be carried long distances, and also comes with a high price tag. But its attractive design and comfort make it a great choice for the aesthetically minded.

The post REI Co-op Wonderland Chair Review: A Comfortable and Attractive Take on a Classic appeared first on GearJunkie.

Every June, a few hundred slightly warped paddlers spread anti-chafing cream on their skin and tape tubes of ibuprofen to the inside walls of their canoes. They top off water bottles, slather on sunscreen, and shove down one last energy bar.

Then, just before 9 a.m., they slide their boats into a spring-fed lake in San Marcos, south of Austin, Texas, and prepare for the start of “The World’s Toughest Canoe Race.”

Colloquially known as the “Safari,” the race started back in 1962, when Texans Frank Brown and Bill “Big Willie” George, paddled their 14-foot fishing boat from San Marcos to Corpus Christi. It took them 20 days and 8 hours, and as the legend goes, they hunted and fished (eating squirrels and bass) along the way.

The next year, the two men invited the public to join them in their misery. Anyone who took them up on the offer would have to bring whatever they needed for the entire trip; no one could hand them supplies along the way. 

Things have changed since then.

Running the Modern Day ‘Texas Water Safari’

The race still follows the cool, clear San Marcos River as it flows into the Guadalupe River and heads toward the Gulf of Mexico, getting muddier as it goes. The race today ends shy of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the town of Seadrift. Though, paddlers still have to slog across the bay to reach the finish line. And depending on how Mother Nature is feeling, those last 10 miles can take a few hours — or an entire day.

Teams get handoffs from support crews at checkpoints along the way. Those support teams can hand the athletes water and ice as well as food (since 2012, when a racer died of hyponatremia, a low concentration of sodium in the blood).

Racers wear GPS trackers so race organizers and fans can track their progress, and they can carry cellphones for emergencies. They also bring flares, snake bite kits, water pumps, headlamps, and other necessities.

But it’s no leisurely paddle.

The race bakes participants in the hot sun, fries their brains with sleep deprivation, and spits them into rapids and saltwater chop. Paddlers haul their boats around dams and over floating mats of logs and brush (and the occasional dead farm animal). They slog through mud, encounter swarms of mosquitos, and pass the occasional alligator. The top finishers don’t stop — not to sleep, not to eat, not even to pee. At a certain point, hallucinations kick in.

In 2022, the race attracted 149 teams of between one and six paddlers each. Some paddled sleek, bullet-shaped racing craft; others used traditional aluminum canoes. Racers range from elite athletes to recreational paddlers out to test their mettle, and they come in all ages and skill levels.

One long-time competitor in his 80s always packs a bag of Swisher Sweets cigars to puff along the way. The six-man “Cowboys” team races every year with a rotating cast of paddlers. In 2019, an all-women’s team dubbed “the Night Witches” became the first all-female squad to finish in under 40 hours. They placed fourth overall.

I myself have started the race twice and finished once. In 2019, I teamed with two veteran female paddlers and finished in about 53 hours. The first 20 hours went well. Then things went south.

My appetite waned; my stomach churned. About 40 hours in, I began to hallucinate. In the dark, trees morphed into leering clowns and bushes became grinning cartoon characters. My butt hurt, my back hurt, and my mind hurt.

When we finished, I staggered out of the water, swore I’d never do the race again, crawled onto a cot, and passed out. I didn’t feel normal for an entire month. (Sleep deprivation will do that to you.) But despite the unpleasantries, the sense of accomplishment was priceless, even if the rash on my rear end stuck around for two more weeks.

Last year, with some of the hottest and driest conditions on race day, I went back for more. It didn’t go well. I got sick (and mentally weak) and dropped out at a place appropriately called Cheapside, after 36 horrendous hours. That year, half the field did not finish.

The rest of my team went on without me and finished in a long and brutal 77 hours.

All you get for surviving what’s billed as “the World’s Toughest Canoe Race” is a 5-inch patch decorated with what looks like an alligator and a devil. You also walk away with a fierce sunburn, cracked lips, blisters as big as pecans, and rashes in places humans should never get rashes.

But trust me when I tell you nothing feels as good as making it to the final buoy in Seadrift and slapping your hands on the wooden marker that signifies the Texas Water Safari finish.

Race Day: How to Register

This year, the Texas Water Safari is celebrating its 60th year. The race starts at 9 a.m. on Saturday, June 10, 2023. Paddlers must finish the 260 miles within 100 hours for their finish to officially count. Other basic rules include you must register for one category — novice, standard, unlimited men/women (up to six paddlers), tandem, solo, masters, and more — and your team must have a captain (18 years or older) to follow along with support, and to track location. 

The deadline to register for the race is May 19. The entry fee is $200 per paddler through May 4, or $250 through May 19. If canoeing in hot weather and grueling conditions sounds like your jam, consider joining the Safari!

Team BendRacing at the Expedition Ozark Adventure Race; (photo/Adventure Racing World Series)

” data-medium-file=”https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/04/magness-bendracing-Team-Finish-shot-300×200.jpg” data-large-file=”https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/04/magness-bendracing-Team-Finish-shot-700×466.jpg” />

The Gear That Won the 400-Mile ‘Expedition Ozark’ Adventure Race

Adventure racing is about a lot of things. But one of the least understood is the role that efficiency and effective gear plays into a team’s success. Read more…

(Photo/Justin Brandenburg)

” data-medium-file=”https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/01/One-Mountain-Biker-Took-a-Chainsaw-to-the-Problem-300×200.jpg” data-large-file=”https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/01/One-Mountain-Biker-Took-a-Chainsaw-to-the-Problem-700×467.jpg” />

Meet the Mountain Biker Who Single-Handedly Cleared 950 Trees to Ride His Favorite Trail

After a windstorm obliterated his favorite trail, one mountain biker took a chainsaw to the problem, clearing 950 trees just so he could ride. Read more…

The post What Is ‘The World’s Toughest Canoe Race’ Like? Find Out at the Texas Water Safari appeared first on GearJunkie.

This week, one lucky winner will receive an AC60+B80 Power Station from BLUETTI.

More on the Prize

Made to power you through even your toughest outdoor environments, the AC60 is dustproof and weather-resistant and claims to supply 600 W of power with its 403Wh LFP battery.

BLUETTI is including the B80 battery in this giveaway as well, giving you access to power for even longer. It should charge devices and small appliances with its USB-C, USB-A, and car cigarette lighter ports. Charge up the device in 1.2 hours through an AC outlet or via solar in 3.5 hours, according to the brand.

More on the Brand

BLUETTI provides a wide range of portable power stations and solar options for remote work, travel, camping, and more. The brand blogs frequently about portable power and solar energy, and it aims to find new ways to take power everywhere.

Be sure to check back every Friday for a new giveaway.
Want the giveaway in your inbox? Sign up here.

The post Free Gear Friday: Win an AC60+B80 Power Station from BLUETTI! appeared first on GearJunkie.

Satellite messengers started with the need for reliable emergency contact, but have expanded beyond emergency needs into full-blown two-way communication devices. While every satellite messenger remains focused on the original function, some have evolved to include peer-to-peer communications and additional features, whether GPS tracking or weather reports. 

In our search for the best satellite messengers we covered it all, but placed a focus on the keyword in a satellite messenger: messenger. With our extensive background testing gear in real-life situations, we put all devices through the paces over several months in differing situations — testing it all from typing ability to durability while getting dirty in the mountains of the Pacific Northwest. 

To better understand the ins and outs of satellite messengers, visit our buyer’s guide, FAQ, and detailed comparison chart. Or, check out some of the key categories that help you understand how a satellite messenger best fits your needs:

The Best Satellite Messengers of 2023

• Best Overall Satellite Messenger: Garmin inReach Messenger
• Best Budget Satellite Messenger: ZOLEO Satellite Messenger
• Most Feature-Rich Satellite Messenger: Garmin inReach Mini 2
• Best On-Device Communicator: SPOT X
• Best GPS Device Satellite Messenger: Garmin GPSMAP 66i

Best Overall Satellite Messenger

Garmin inReach Messenger

Specs

• Battery life 28 days
• Message composition On-device options/in-app
• Weight 4 oz.
• Water resistance IPX7
• Satellite system Iridium
• Subscription plan $11.95 /month for annual ‘Safety’ plan

Pros

• Compact size and weight
• In-depth functionality
• Extended battery life with reverse USB-C charging

Cons

• Small screen
• Cost

Tim Newcomb

Diversity of communication ability gives the Garmin inReach Messenger ($300) a place above the rest in the satellite messenger world, and easily landed it as our best overall device to date.

While other devices might rely on satellite communication alone, this Messenger works with your smartphone to send messages via your cellular network when it’s available, then defaults to the Iridium satellite network when cellular is not. Very slick.

This seamless messaging stream within the app was one of our favorite features and can be a huge boon for people who travel in and out of the backcountry. The on-device options include a handful of pre-programmed menus to scroll through via the screen, and allow you the ability to craft messages (albeit slowly), track your progress, or seek out a weather forecast while abroad. 

The compact 3 by 2.5-inch design weighs in at 4 ounces and is a sturdy build, rated to IPX7 water resistance. But unlike other devices of its size — or even slightly larger — you still get a small screen to monitor battery life, read messages, and adjust settings, all within the device.

Expect the Garmin inReach Messenger to fit the needs of any regular adventurer. With its stellar mix of on-device and in-app messaging and functionality in a compact design, the device has something for everyone, earning it the title of best overall device on our list.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Amazon

Best Budget Satellite Messenger

ZOLEO Satellite Messenger

Specs

• Battery life 200 hours
• Message composition In-app composition
• Weight 5.3 oz.
• Water resistance IP68
• Satellite system Iridium
• Subscription plan $20 /month for ‘Basic’ plan

Pros

• Combination of on-device and in-app functions
• Ease-of-use
• Stout Iridium satellite network reception

Cons

• Limited on-device functionality

Tim Newcomb

The best budget satellite messenger doesn’t have to be the most basic. The ZOLEO Satellite Communicator ($200) offers straightforward on-device functionality with a wider suite of options when paired with the smartphone app, building a variety of abilities for a budget-minded adventurer who doesn’t want to skimp on capability. 

The Satellite Communicator offers basic messaging via the device — think SOS and a pre-set “okay” message — and then adds to that with additional options via the smartphone app that includes message composition for both sending and receiving. 

Primarily using the Iridium global satellite network, the device can also send messages using cellular coverage. Like the Garmin Messenger, the ZOLEO device will default to sending a message with cellular or WiFi service if it’s available, and will even receive messages if the device is turned off. 

Within the simple app, you can compose specific messages — though not on the device itself. This was our main quibble with the ZOLEO device, as it can be incredibly useful in coordinating, and having the potential to lose the ability should your phone die is a tough sale. Luckily, the Power On button can send out a pre-set alert that lets a programmed contact know you are doing fine, which is a good addition in our opinion.

In practice, we found that setting up and getting the ZOLEO going to be seamless. And connectivity with Iridium proved successful, even if within the slower confines of satellite communications. The color-coded button on the device indicated we may need to move out of trees to find a better signal, helping speed up the connection time. 

We enjoyed the durable design of the device, the budget-friendly initial cost, and the added functionality of the app. When taken together, the Satellite Communicator from ZOLEO offers a solid entry point for someone looking for a satellite messenger without needing full on-device functionality.

Need to know more? Dig into our in-depth review of the ZOLEO Satellite Communicator.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Amazon

Best Feature-Rich Messenger

Garmin inReach Mini 2

Specs

• Battery life 14 days
• Message composition On-device options/in-app
• Weight 3.5 oz.
• Water resistance IPX7
• Satellite system Iridium
• Subscription plan $11.95 /month for annual ‘Safety’ plan

Pros

• Compact size
• Improved screen over predecessor
• In-device navigation abilities

Cons

• Cost
• No cellular or WiFi coverage

Tim Newcomb

Don’t let the mini moniker fool you, the Garmin inReach Mini 2 ($400) still packs quite the punch when it comes to satellite messengers. And that’s exactly why it earned the title of best feature-rich messenger in our testing — an ideal choice for someone looking for a mixture of compact design without sacrificing any features. 

Let’s be upfront: The inReach Mini 2 isn’t that far off from the inReach Messenger. It just comes in a slightly different package that makes on-device functionality a bit simpler. They both use the same apps and have many of the same features, so you’re likely choosing to spend more on the Mini because of the ease of on-device use and novel navigation capabilities.

The Mini 2 offers the ability to send text messages — or even post to social media — directly from the device or app, along with checking weather (even for locations you aren’t currently at, a bonus function that helps set it apart), sharing locations, accessing Garmin’s TracBack routing feature, or using the device as a digital compass. 

Setting the inReach Mini 2 apart from the Messenger is a set of rudimentary on-device navigation abilities, including straight-line navigation to waypoints, reverse breadcrumb tracking, and following courses that have been added to the device either online or through the app. These features won’t compete with most phone navigation applications today, but they certainly are functional should the need arise.

You may have trouble finding something you don’t enjoy with the inReach Mini 2 (other than the purchase price) and for someone looking for all the bells and whistles, both on the device and in the app, in a streamlined design, this is the option of choice. Read more about the inReach Mini 2 in our in-depth review.

Check Price at REI

Best On-Device Communicator

SPOT X

Specs

• Battery life 240 hours in 10-minute tracking mode
• Message composition On-device composition
• Weight 7 oz.
• Water resistance IP67
• Satellite system Globalstar
• Subscription plan $11.95 /month for annual ‘Basic’ plan

Pros

• Familiar QWERTY on-screen message composition
• Ability to compose messages on or off the device
• In-device navigation capable

Cons

• Bulky size
• Globalstar network isn’t the most robust

Tim Newcomb

Think Blackberry with a satellite connection — that’s what comes to mind when first working with the SPOT X Satellite Messenger ($250), and it’s why it easily earned its spot as our best on-screen communicator. Ideal for the adventurer who doesn’t want to be tied to a smartphone in any way, this device gets the job done all on its own.

The illuminated QWERTY keyboard is the real star of the show here, and makes the SPOT X an effective on-device message composer — a real bonus for communication in the wild when you don’t want to pull out a smartphone. The device even incorporates predictive text technology to allow you to breeze through longer messages.

Along with the SOS and wayfinding, it is the two-way communication that makes the SPOT X stand out. And while it was originally only offered without it, you can now decide if you want to use the associated smartphone app for sending and receiving messages, or keep the smartphone stowed and send-receive only on the device, which we found was actually pretty easy to do.

Unfortunately, the SPOT Globalstar network is one of the slower satellite options we investigated, and there’s certainly a need to find a clear path to the sky for the SPOT X. When you get that, though, it can speed up your communication. 

We also had a few grumbles with getting the SPOT X set up, as firmware updates require a cable and computer to accomplish. But once those hoops are navigated, the device is a fairly straightforward piece of kit to operate.

The SPOT X puts on-device functionality front and center. If that’s important for you—and you’re okay with the added heft of the device—give this option a spin. If you want to learn more about the SPOT X, take a look at our first look review.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Amazon

Best GPS Device Messenger

Garmin GPSMAP 66i

Specs

• Battery life 200 hours
• Message composition On-device options/in-app
• Weight 8.1 oz.
• Water resistance MIL-STD-810
• Satellite system Iridium
• Subscription plan $11.95 /month for annual ‘Safety’ plan

Pros

• Communicates with other inReach devices
• Predictive text
• Compatible with Garmin Explore app

Cons

• Larger overall size
• Price

Tim Newcomb

Best thought of as a GPS first, communicator second, the Garmin GPSMAP 66i ($600) is the rightful heir to the place long held by the now discontinued inReach Explorer+, and offers an impressive amount of mapping ability in conjunction with its messaging chops.

As a stand-alone GPS, the 66i has just about everything you’d be looking for — but once you add in the inReach communication abilities, it becomes a true powerhouse for those who want an all-in-one device. Easily accessed, the messaging can be accomplished on or off the device and makes use of predictive text to breeze through messages.

In addition to the full suite of inReach messaging abilities, the 66i also supports both basic and premium weather forecasts, for both land and marine locations. These forecasts can be incredibly helpful when you’re deep into an expedition and need to shed a little light on what’s in store for the next week.

Curiously, we will note that the GPSMAP 66i is not currently compatible with Garmin’s Messenger app, instead being supported only by the older Garmin Explore app. This tracks, as the Messenger app offers none of the navigation ability that the previous app does, though we do find it much easier to use.

At a larger overall footprint and weight, you’ll need to use the GPS capabilities of the Garmin GPSMAP 66i to make it worth carrying along. But as a one-stop shop for your navigation, messaging, SOS, and weather, it can handle it all.

Check Price at REI

Best of the Rest

SPOT Gen4

Specs

• Battery life 7 days to 156 days (dependent on tracking)
• Message composition Pre-set messages only
• Weight 5 oz.
• Water resistance IPX8
• Satellite system Globalstar
• Subscription plan $11.95 /month for annual ‘Basic’ plan

Pros

• Simple to operate
• Minimal size
• Inexpensive

Cons

• Lack of functionality
• No two-way messaging
• Not rechargeable

Tim Newcomb

In the modern world of satellite messengers, the SPOT Gen4 ($150) doesn’t quite sit at the head of the table — but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t fill an important spot in the market for folks searching for something akin to a backup messaging option. 

The Gen4 has no custom on-device or in-app messaging, and there’s very little in the way of features beyond the SOS signaling, pre-set message sending and GPS location sends. But for the pre-planner, or just as a purely emergency device, the Gen4 fulfills its duty well.

When it comes to messaging, you’ve got three options with this device: Pre-programmed, an SOS call, and the clever option for a “spot assist” if you don’t need emergency services, but you do need to let loved ones know things aren’t going well. In our minds, this makes the Gen4 ideal for riding in the glovebox for emergencies.

We will note that all message recipients must be established pre-trip as there’s no way to reconfigure the device when away from a computer, and there’s no way for the SPOT Gen4 to receive messages. 

In testing out the messaging system of the SPOT Gen4, it appeared to struggle the most to find a signal (not wildly uncommon in satellite communications). The SPOT Gen4 does offer green LED lights to let you know you have a satellite connection and red lights to let you know you’re not connected, an added benefit from a budget option.

The SPOT Gen4 is a slimmed-down, bare-bones version of a satellite messenger. That may be the ideal design for your needs. Check out all the details on the SPOT Gen4 in our independent review.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Amazon

ACR Bivy Stick

Specs

• Battery life 120 hours
• Message composition In-app composition
• Weight 3.3 oz.
• Water resistance IPX7
• Satellite system Iridium
• Subscription plan $14.99 /month for annual ‘Basic’ plan

Pros

• Lightweight, easily stowable
• Ample app features
• USB-C charging

Cons

• Limited battery life
• No on-device messaging ability

Tim Newcomb

The ACR Bivy Stick ($250) takes a slightly different approach and relies heavily on its well-performing app for the bulk of its functionality. This makes the Bivy Stick ideal for the adventurer wanting basic on-device functionality while willing to rely on the smartphone app for all the fun extras. 

The Bivy’s on-device functionality is basic, with an SOS button tucked under a rubberized flap — ACR uses Global Rescue for its emergency services — a USB-C charging port, and a pre-set “okay” button. 

The functionality really steps up with the Bluetooth-connected app. In the app, you can compose and receive messages, both email and text, while adding your location to your communication. We will note that like ZOLEO, the Bivy Stick will send and receive on the Iridium network — as well as cellular or WiFi coverage.

Quick-touch options in the app also perform message alerts, SOS calls, and more. The app offers a map view so you can track your current location and progress (or see routes) and other options let you see your data usage, track adventures, check the weather, and—for an additional subscription price—create group messages. 

Two LED lights give you info on the signal strength and status of a message, which is a nice function that some others don’t have. The signal lights go from green to yellow to red to let you know strength, while the status light lets you know if you’re sending or receiving a message, if SOS is active, and if you’re successfully tracking your progress. 

We admit these are nice touches that we used when figuring out signal strength, and if a message was sent. Bivy uses the Iridium satellite network and offers a dedicated phone number and email for satellite messaging, another feature common with ZOLEO, but not yet offered by Garmin. 

Bivy certainly fits within the budget options for an adventurer not requiring much from the on-device options. Add in the lightweight design and solid app functionality, the Bivy Stick has a singular place within the satellite messenger space.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Amazon

Satellite Messenger Comparison Chart

Why You Should Trust Us

We’d be lying if we said we’ve never gotten ourselves lost. But thankfully, the crew at GearJunkie is a savvy bunch, and our trials and tribulations have led us to be big proponents of carrying along a satellite messaging device when headed out into the backcountry. Here, we’ve compiled our collective knowledge around the little life-savers and called out the best of the best sold today.

All devices detailed in our selection were tested over multiple months, by multiple gear experts and in varying conditions throughout the Pacific Northwest, and the American Southwest. Whether hiking, biking, climbing, ski-touring, or simply putting the devices through their paces, the satellite messengers underwent a mixture of experiences to test them in real-life use cases. 

While checking out the satellite messengers in the field, we assessed durability, connectivity, ease of use, functionality, and battery life. Beyond our team’s experience, we also considered the most popular and bestselling devices on the market, as well as a broad range of price points and features. And rest assured, as new devices hit the market, we’ll continue to put them to the test to see if they have what it takes when it matters.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose a Satellite Messenger 

Every satellite messenger features a mixture of different functions and designs. Users may find some fit their expected adventures better than others, so it isn’t always a one-size-fits-all approach to selecting the best satellite messenger. 

Before you dive into a satellite messenger, be careful to go over features and functionality to see what you think you’ll need for how you expect to use the device. You also should keep in mind that the cost of ownership of a satellite messenger is more than the initial purchase price. While you can get a device for as little as $150 and spend up to $400, each one requires a subscription service to allow it to connect to satellites for communication, even emergency communication. 

Once you’ve narrowed down your top satellite messenger selections, we suggest looking over the company’s subscription plans to see what’s included in the differing options. Features you may find essential may come at a steeper per month price than you want to pay. 

Emergency Support and Messaging

Know that a satellite messenger’s main goal is to provide emergency support when needed — every messenger comes with an on-device SOS button, but they also can help keep you connected to friends and family in non-emergency situations when cellular coverage is not possible. 

You likely won’t use your satellite messenger as you would a smartphone—and if you don’t expect to, you can select something such as the ZOLEO or SPOT Gen4—but understanding the capabilities of your device can help with expectations. For example, messages sent via satellite may well take up to 20 minutes to send, even in ideal situations with the best on-device communicators the Garmin inReach Mini 2 and SPOT X.

Differing Styles

There are three main styles of satellite messenger, although overlap does exist. The most basic offers a simple SOS function and pre-set messages, all sent from the device without tethering to a phone, such as the SPOT Gen4. These devices are best thought of as a ‘set it and forget it’ option, and you’ll be limited to sending messages that you’ve pre-written at home.

The next type offers these same functions, but then includes an app — think ZOLEO and Bivy Stick — that connects via Bluetooth to a smartphone for additional messaging and functionality. This is a great step up in terms of functionality in our opinion, and being able to craft custom messages has often gotten us out of a jam when outdoors, like changing itineraries or rendezvous points.

The third style includes the aforementioned features, but then also offers on-device functionality, from message composition to weather forecasting, as seen in the Garmin inReach Messenger, Garmin inReach Mini 2, and SPOT X. These messengers are best for folks who want it all, or want the ability to leave their phone at home. Because they operate independently of a separate device, these messengers also have the most built-in safety of the bunch.

Satellite Messenger Networks

First, it’s important to make a distinction between the two types of satellite systems that a satellite messenger will depend on. Global Navigation Satellite Systems, or GNSS, are satellite networks that provide location and speed information to devices like handheld GPS units. The most well-known of these is the GPS system which is managed by the U.S. government, though other international systems exist.

Satellite messaging systems, like Iridium and Globalstar, provide communications information between the transmitter and receiver, and each service features Low Earth Orbit satellites covering much of the Earth. In fact, the polar orbit of Iridium satellites allows it to cover even the poles, while Globalstar has points on Earth it doesn’t reach. 

Iridium has more satellites than Globalstar, but Globalstar sends them higher to provide additional coverage. Another key difference is Globalstar relays with Earth-based transmission stations, which can cause a greater delay in messaging than the satellite-to-satellite relays from Iridium. No matter the device you choose, check the coverage areas of their satellite provider to ensure it covers your planned adventures. 

When you send a message, your device will queue it up for the next time that is it in contact with the Iridium or Globalstar network. While these systems offer broad coverage, it may take a few minutes for a satellite to pass overhead and into view of the satellite messenger. Finding a clearing or promontory can greatly improve your reception.

​​Emergency Coordination

For obvious reasons, we didn’t test the response time of emergency responders. But every satellite messenger comes with an SOS button that summons emergency help. Each company contracts with a service provider to coordinate a response, and while we don’t have data from every one, we do know that those buttons do get pushed a good bit: Garmin recently fielded its 10,000th inReach SOS call.

Garmin recently purchased GEOS, now owning one of the leading emergency operations. ZOLEO contracts with GEOS. ACR’s Bivy uses Global Rescue and SPOT contracts with FocusPoint International. All of these services are on the other end when you trigger an emergency call.

What Happens When You Trigger an SOS?

When you make the call to trigger an SOS, you’ll need to uncover and depress the SOS button to summon help. This will send a message to the emergency service provider that you have contracted with through your subscription. It’s important to know that without a current subscription, SOS service does not work.

On Garmin devices, these SOS messages are given a higher priority in the Iridium satellite system to ensure that they get to where they need to go. No matter the service, the functionality is similar, with the company working with local search and rescue teams to coordinate a response to your SOS call. 

Some devices, like the Garmin inReach Messenger, SPOT X, and ZOLEO Satellite Messenger, allow you to send custom SOS messages to the emergency response service. This can be incredibly helpful when coordinating a rescue, and often an emergency coordinator will put you in contact with the local Search and Rescue (SAR) to better assist you. Response times can vary from a few hours to a few days, depending entirely on terrain, weather, and resources.

Messaging, Weather Updates, and Tracking

Thankfully, the majority of us will never need to hit that SOS button, instead relying on our satellite messengers to communicate with others, seek out weather updates, and track ourselves on excursions. Most all devices offer two-way messaging, with the exception of the SPOT Gen4, meaning you’ll be able to both create, and receive messages from abroad.

A 160-character limit is typical of most SMS and email messages sent from satellite messengers, with slight variation from provider to provider. These messages can also be appended with your GPS location, giving those on the outside some peace of mind knowing where you’re at.

Types of Messages

Messages fall into one of two categories: Preset, Predefined, or Check-In messages, and Custom messages. Messages in the Preset category are those that are arranged before setting out on our trip, and typically relay messages such as “I’m Okay,” “I’m Starting My Trip Here,” or “I Made it To Camp.” These messages are very often unlimited and don’t count against your subscription allotments.

Custom messages are those that are created on-the-fly, and can either be produced on-device or through an accompanying app. These messages are not limited to who they can be sent to, but they will count against your subscription if you have a messaging limit. Don’t fear if you go over, however, all providers will spot you extra messages, at a typical 25-50 cent rate per message.

Weather Forecasts

Certain satellite messengers, like the Garmin and ZOLEO devices, also utilize their satellite connections to deliver weather forecasts directly to your messenger. These forecasts will display the high/low temperature, conditions, wind speed and direction, and precipitation chance of either the location you are currently in, or a location of your choosing.

Garmin devices also offer an extended forecasting option (at $1.00 /per), which bumps out the forecast window from four to eight days, and offers a finer interval of forecast reporting. There is also the option to request a marine forecast, which includes information on wave height, currents, and visibility.

Tracking

Tracking your progress can be a handy tool for both yourself, as well as those following along at home. This tracking is most often broken down into different intervals, allowing you to adjust the frequency at which a location is recorded. SPOT devices provide tracking at all levels of subscription, whereas Garmin offers it unlimited at the mid-tier subscription rate, and ZOLEO offers it as a ‘Location Share+’ add-on for $6 /month extra.

When it comes to the pay-to-track crowd, we will note that the Bivy Stick is a particularly poor deal when it comes to tracking: A monthly basic plan allows 20 credits, which are shared between messages and tracking and can quickly be chewed up at one credit per 30 minutes at the five-minute tracking interval. You can par down your tracking interval to once every hour, but functionally we find this to be too coarse for accurate tracking.

Applications

We can’t go too far without needing an app for that these days, and it’s the same in the world of satellite messengers. A few of the key devices tested, such as the ZOLEO and Bivy, require you to connect via Bluetooth to your smartphone to use the app for custom messaging, and most of the functionality (really, anything other than the SOS or “Okay” message.) 

Garmin, while allowing for on-device messaging on both the inReach Messenger and inReach Mini 2, has a strong app that makes messaging much simpler than on the device. We’ll note that even some Garmin smartwatches integrate with the devices for easy wrist-triggered SOS messages.

The SPOT X doesn’t rely as much on an app, but it is there for additional functions. And it works just swell. The SPOT Gen4 is the only device we tested that doesn’t tie into an app for its in-field functionality. 

The Functionality You Need

What you need out of a satellite messenger depends on the adventures you’ll go on. Are you a one-day or weekend trip adventurer who is generally in cellular coverage, but wants access to the SOS function for those emergency situations when cellular coverage might not be available? If so, going basic may be enough. 

Are you planning multi-day trips out of cellular coverage and want to not only have emergency functions, but also messaging capabilities? That will require a device that can handle your plans. Understand what type of adventurer you are and select a messenger—and service plan—to fit those needs. 

Satellite Messenger Subscription Plans

Beyond your one-time purchase price, you’ll also need to select a subscription service to render the device useful. Typically offered as monthly plans, you can select how many messages you can use, how much tracking you can do, and so forth. Carefully look through service plan options before you buy so you don’t get stuck with a device you don’t want to pay to stay active. 

Garmin inReach Plans

The Garmin plans offer great flexibility in pricing (as low as $15 and as high as $65 per month), which also impacts what you get. The plans are broken up into two tiers: Consumer and Professional, as well as two different types of payment structures: Freedom Plans and Annual Contracts.

The most basic monthly consumer plans allow for 10 text messages, tracking intervals of every 10 minutes and an activation fee of $30 with overage charges for additional text messages, weather services, and location requests. The $65 monthly plan offers tracking every two minutes and unlimited tracking points, text messages, location requests, and more. 

ZOLEO Plans

ZOLEO ranges from $20 to $35 to $50 per month and steps from 25 messages to 250 to unlimited along the plan choices. You can add $6 per month for location shares and get unlimited check-in messages. Overages for each message is $.50 for the first two plans. ZOLEO has a $20 activation fee. 

SPOT Plans

The SPOT X plans range from $12 to $40 per month with six different plans. Expect to get anywhere from 20 custom messages to hundreds or even unlimited messages. The SPOT Gen4 features two plans, either $12 or $15 per month, depending on if you sign up for a year or go month-to-month. The nearly identical plans both come with unlimited check-in or help messages and basic tracking. SPOT has a $30 activation fee. 

ACR Plans

The Bivy Stick has four plans—all available at a discount for a yearly contract or more expensive for a month-to-month contract—ranging from $15 per month to $65. The basic plan includes 20 credits, which can be used as a message or tracking, with overages of $.75 per credit. Each step up includes additional credits and services until unlimited credits with group tracking. Bivy has no activation fee, instead differentiating the monthly price based on contract length. 

Size, Weight, and Batteries

While most satellite messengers are compact, some do come lighter and smaller than others (here’s looking at you, inReach Mini 2 and Bivy Stick). And that may be great in certain situations. If you’re lugging tons of equipment with you, a few ounces or an inch or two in size may not matter and you can embrace the SPOT X, but if you want something you can carry in your hand while you run or clip to a small pack while you bike, for example, these specifications will hold extra importance. 

Another specification to watch is battery life, especially if you plan on long adventures or already have a set routine for charging devices (will micro-USB or USB-C require you to bring an extra cord?) while on an adventure. Most satellite messengers aim to provide extended battery life for long trips into the backcountry, but it’s important to remember that this battery life can be limited by the number of messages sent, tracking intervals, and active screen time.

Almost all sat messengers today, with the exception of the SPOT Gen4, sport an integrated rechargeable battery that can be juiced up in the field from a solar panel or power bank. Some, like the Garmin inReach Messenger, even offer reverse USB-C charging that can perk up your other electronics if needed.

Durability

New brands need to start somewhere but decide if you’re willing to start with them. The likes of Garmin and SPOT have led the satellite messenger categories for years, so have built-in dependability in terms of quality of product. But that doesn’t mean that ACR or ZOLEO aren’t there yet. All the messengers we tested, except for SPOT-branded devices, use the trusted Iridium satellite system for reliable coverage, so we don’t expect issues there. 

Then there’s the durability of the device itself. Each device has undergone testing to earn an international IP number. Both the Garmin devices nor the Bivy Stick weren’t tested against dust and earned a 7 for water (an IPX7 rating represents this), which allows for water immersion protection up to three feet for 30 minutes. 

The SPOT X earned an IP67, which offers complete dust protection with the same level of water protection. 

The SPOT Gen4 and ZOLEO devices are rated at IP68, complete dust protection with water immersion protection for long periods of time under pressure, the most durable of the devices tested. 

Understand how you plan to use your satellite messenger and then choose a device that fits your personal needs. 

FAQ

What is a Satellite Messenger? 

A satellite messenger, which requires a subscription service to operate, connects to a satellite system to send and receive messages. This process is different than the near-instantaneous response of a cellular or WiFi network. The device uses this satellite capability to keep you connected to others when cellular coverage is not available.

Should I Get a Satellite Messenger?

If you plan to adventure beyond cellular coverage, you may want to consider having an active subscription to a satellite messenger. The only reliable way to call for emergency services or let loved ones know you’re in a safe place is by relying on satellite messenger coverage.

Does Garmin Make the Best Satellite Messenger?

It is hard to argue that Garmin doesn’t make the best satellite messengers, whether the inReach Messenger or the inReach Mini 2, but that doesn’t mean Garmin is the only manufacturer of quality satellite messengers.

We can recommend Garmin products based on our independent testing, but were also impressed with a mixture of additional satellite messengers from a variety of companies.

Is On-Device Messaging Needed for a Satellite Messenger?

In short, potentially. You want to ensure that you have the SOS option on your satellite messenger — a standard feature in the industry — and the ability to send an “I’m okay” message when needed. 

How much additional functionality you want to have on your device is up to you. Relying on tethering to your smartphone via Bluetooth requires that your phone doesn’t lose connectivity to your device and your phone stays charged and accessible. The more on-device message composition functionality, the less you need to rely on your smartphone and the device’s app to stay connected.

How Quickly Does a Satellite Messenger Send a Message?

Be patient when it comes to satellite messages. It may take just a few minutes to send a message, especially with a clear sky and no tree coverage. But getting a connection to a satellite may be tough in some locations, and even the positioning of satellites or heavy cloud cover can alter the timeline of your message. 

Keep in mind, there’s no guarantee you can get a signal to a satellite, so some cases may require a high level of patience or willingness to move in order to connect to the satellite.

Gadgets

The Best Handheld GPS of 2023

There’s no need to rely on your smartphone or smartwatch for navigation. We rounded up the best handheld GPS devices for finding your way.

group of fitness watches displayed for comparison

” data-image-caption=”

Comparing fitness watches while testing in California; (photo/Cory Smith)

” data-medium-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2021/01/ComparingFitnessWatches-300×225.jpg” data-large-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2021/01/ComparingFitnessWatches-700×525.jpg” />

Endurance

The Best Fitness Watches of 2023

We tested the best fitness watches of 2023 with options for every budget. Our top picks include Garmin, Fitbit, and more!

The post The Best Satellite Messengers of 2023 appeared first on GearJunkie.

There are many varieties of winter traction devices on the market. Some utilize low-profile metal coils and others function like less aggressive ice climbing crampons. Whether you’re looking to safely walk the icy city streets or trail run through the frozen backcountry, there’s a traction device that matches your needs.

To develop this list, we tested a massive pile of options from brands including Yaktrax, Black Diamond, Kahoola, and Hillsound. After extensive field research involving hiking, running, and slip-sliding over all kinds of terrain, we’ve identified the top traction devices of 2023.

For additional help narrowing down your search, check out our buyer’s guide, FAQ, and comparison chart. Or, simply jump ahead to the category you’re looking for.

The Best Winter Traction Devices of 2023

• Best Overall Winter Traction Device: Kahtoola EXOspikes
• Best Budget Winter Traction Device: Yaktrax Pro Traction
• Best Ultralight Winter Traction Devices: Black Diamond Blitz Spike
• Best Winter Traction Devices for Technical Hiking: Hillsound Trail Crampon
• Best Winter Traction Devices for Runners: Korkers Ice Runner

Best Overall Winter Traction Devices

Kahtoola EXOspikes

Specs

• Weight per pair 7.3 oz. (medium)
• Traction Twelve tungsten carbide spikes
• Harness Lightweight elastic rubber with reinforced eyelets
• Best for Walking, hiking, and running on a variety of surfaces

Pros

• Versatile
• Secure fit
• Durable cleats don’t wear down
• Grippy on various surfaces

Cons

• Not the most packable

Austin Beck-Doss

KAHtoola is one of the leaders in the traction device game, and the brand makes a host of various models. The EXOspikes ($63) are designed for hiking and train running, and though they worked great for those purposes, we found them to be equally effective in town.

Outfitted with twelve quarter-inch integrated spikes per foot, the EXOspikes provide reliable grip across the entire underfoot area. Each spike is made from hardwearing tungsten carbide — the same stuff that’s used on the tips of many well-regarded trekking poles. After several walks, runs, and jogs on rocky snow-covered hillsides, the traction on our EXOspikes remains fully intact.

During testing, reliable traction was our primary concern. On icy and hard-packed snow, the EXOspikes excelled. We felt confident on everything from slick crosswalks to treacherous exposed switchbacks.

On soft surfaces like deep fresh snow, these spikes felt a little less secure than other options on this list, probably because the spikes are thin with minimal surface area. Still, if you stick to the ice and hardpack, the EXOspikes are golden. They provide crampon-like bite but are low profile and lightweight. They’re a great choice for runners.

The thin elastic rubber harness keeps the spikes in place with minimal shifting or slippage. Even in freezing conditions, the harness remained pliable enough to put on and take off with ease.

Though the EXOspikes aren’t performance-oriented, we found them to be the perfect middle ground for folks who only want to own one pair of microspikes. They’re techy enough for runs and rugged terrain, but they’re also durable enough for everyday in-town use.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Amazon

Best Budget Winter Traction Devices

Yaktrax Pro Traction

Specs

• Weight per pair 6.4 oz. (medium)
• Traction X-pattern of steel coils over rubber harness
• Harness Rubber with velcro strap
• Best for Walking, running, and hiking on moderate terrain

Pros

• Good value
• Traction system covers the entire underfoot area
• Low profile

Cons

• Not ideal for technical terrain

Austin Beck-Doss

Yaktrax is a well-known and well-regarded maker of traction devices. Take a close look at footprints on any snow-covered sidewalk and you’ll likely see the X-shaped prints from a pair of Yaktrax. The brand’s classic steel coil traction system has been popular for decades — and rightfully so.

The Yaktrax Pro ($35) is a slightly upgraded version of the brand’s basic Walkers model, and we feel it provides the best bang for your buck. With steel coil-wrapped rubber laid out across the underside of the foot and a Velcro strap across the top of the foot, the Pro maintains a reliable grip on icy city streets and hard-packed snow-covered trails.

Compared to the tiny tungsten carbide spikes of our best overall pick, the Yaktrax Pro takes a more surface area-based approach to traction. The X-pattern of steel coils works well for all kinds of gaits and walking strides — there aren’t any unaddressed slick zones on the Pro. We also appreciate that the steel coils and X-pattern don’t become easily clogged with snow, mud, or ice.

If you’re seeking a traction device for everyday walks on graded surfaces, the Yaktrax Pro is an excellent affordable option. If you plan to run and hike on steep, rocky, or technical terrain, these won’t provide the durability or rugged traction you’re searching for.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Cabela’s

Best Ultralight Winter Traction Devices

Black Diamond Blitz Spike

Specs

• Weight per pair About 3.2 oz. (medium)
• Traction Six 8 mm stainless steel spikes in the forefoot area
• Harness Rubber heel webbing loop and thin toe strap
• Best for Ultralight backpacking, light and fast technical winter travel

Pros

• Ultralight
• Packable
• Stuff sack included

Cons

• Only provides traction in the forefoot area

Austin Beck-Doss

Most traction devices aren’t very packable. For backpackers and other light and fast travelers, the Blitz Spikes ($50) from Black Diamond are a pared-down alternative that easily fits into a backpack brain or jacket pocket.

Unlike most of the other devices on this list, the Blitz spikes only provide traction in the forefoot area. Six stainless steel mini-crampon-style spikes are arranged in a triangular pattern between the arch of the foot and the toes. The spikes are connected to the rubber heel strap with a thin-yet-rugged steel chain.

Ultimately, the benefits and drawbacks of these spikes are the same: they’re fully minimalist. If you’re a heel striker walking around on slippery sidewalks, you’ll want a different pair with complete underfoot traction. Meanwhile, if you’re an ultralight backpacker and you only plan to wear spikes on the occasional snowy section of trail, the Blitz Spikes are the perfect product.

The simplified harness involves an elastic rubber heel loop and a thin strap that wraps over the toe. Though the Blitz spikes stayed on our feet during many miles of icy uphill travel, we noticed more slippage in these than we did with more robust harness systems. Again, these are no-frills. If traction is your sole concern, we recommend you go with something more substantial like the KAHtoola EXOspikes.

All in all, we feel that the Blitz Spikes perfectly fill the minimalist niche. If you’re a sure-footed and fast-moving outdoors person seeking a little more traction without weighing yourself down, these are well worth the $50.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Amazon

Best Winter Traction Devices for Technical Hiking

Hillsound Trail Crampon

Specs

• Weight per pair 1 lb. (medium)
• Traction 11 2/3″ carbon steel spikes per crampon
• Harness Burly over-foot harness with velcro strap
• Best for Hiking on steep terrain

Pros

• Highly secure harness system
• Grippy on technical hiking terrain
• Good value

Cons

• Heavy
• Despite the name, these aren’t technical crampons

Austin Beck-Doss

Compared to most of the traction devices on this list, the Hillsound Trail Crampons ($80) are heavy-duty. These steel spikes aren’t built for short strolls on the city streets. Instead, they’re best for steep winter hikes where reliable grip is essential.

At 1 lb. per, these hiking crampons are significantly heavier than most traction devices. You can feel them on your feet while hiking, and they’re a nuisance to carry around in your pack. A little extra weight is an expected tradeoff for tough all-terrain bite.

Despite the name, the Trail Crampons are not designed for vertical terrain or alpine climbing. They’re a nice middle ground between basic microspikes and true alpine crampons. Still, there is nothing “micro” about these spikes. At 2/3″ long, these carbon steel points are aggressive enough to cut into ice-covered trails and snowy third-class terrain.

The harness system is perhaps the most secure and durable that we’ve tested. Thick rubber straps lock in around the top of the foot, and a durable Velcro strap helps prevent slippage. We’ve been out on a few rough and rocky trails with the Trail Crampons, and there is still no evidence of wear.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Amazon

Best Winter Traction Devices for Runners

Korkers Ice Runner

Specs

• Weight per pair 11 oz.
• Traction 22 replaceable carbide studs
• Harness Rubber underfoot platform and top plate with customizable BOA fit adjustment
• Best for Running in town and on moderate trails

Pros

• Secure fit
• Replaceable studs improve overall longevity
• Customizable fit

Cons

• Only compatible with running shoes

Austin Beck-Doss

For many dedicated runners, the treadmill just doesn’t cut it. Even when the trails and sidewalks are frozen solid, some folks can resist the call of the outdoors. If you enjoy outdoor running in every season, the Korkers Ice Runner ($70) is the ideal winter traction device.

Compared to the rubber strap harnesses of most other options, Korkers uses a sandwich-style system that cradles the heel and hugs the forefoot to eliminate slippage. The snug fit comes in handy — especially while running.

Unlike the elastic rubber harnesses found on most traction devices, these utilize an adjustable BOA fit system. The singular dial allows precise fit customization.

Eleven steel carbide studs per foot provide traction, and each can be popped out and replaced if/when it wears out. Though we like the longevity benefit of the replaceable studs, we did find that they occasionally pop out on hard-paved surfaces.

These microspikes really are running-specific. High-volume shoes and boots won’t fit into the Ice Runner harness. Also, they tend to work best on ice and hard-packed moderate trails. The studs aren’t long enough to offer much traction in deep snow or mud.

Check Price at AmazonCheck Price at Korkers

Best of the Rest

Yaktrax ICEtrekkers Diamond Grip

Specs

• Weight per pair 11.2 oz. (medium)
• Traction Free-spinning steel alloy beads slung on steel cable in the forefoot and heel
• Harness Thin elastic rubber with riveted eyelets
• Best for In-town use and semi-technical trails

Pros

• Innovative traction system
• Versitile
• Relatively packable

Cons

• Some users have reported durability issues

Austin Beck-Doss

These innovative traction devices from Yaktrax are a departure from the brand’s typical steel coil traction system. The highly versatile ICEtrekkers Diamond Grip ($55) sports free-spinning steel spikes strung on loops of cable in the forefoot and heel. We’ve used the Diamond Grips on casual walks to the post office and while post-holing up a steep snow-covered hillside. In both cases, we were impressed with its grippy performance.

The simple harness system involves thin strips of rubber, which is a concern for long-term longevity. Some users have experienced breakage of the harness or steel cable breaking, though that hasn’t happened to us during initial testing.

It took us a few tries to figure out how to properly put on the Diamond Grip. Once the steel loops were finally centered underfoot, they stayed in place and didn’t slip. We do wish the Diamond Grip had an additional over-foot Velcro strap for a more precise fit.

Ultimately, these are great all-around traction devices. They are relatively light and packable and perform decently well when it’s time to venture beyond the sidewalk.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Amazon

Winter Traction Device Comparison Table

Why You Should Trust Us

The bulk of our winter traction device testing was conducted by Austin Beck-Doss during an exceptionally snowy Wyoming winter. Several times per week, Austin trekked up the side of a steep canyon through icy trail conditions. In town, Austin ran errands by foot, traversing sidewalks and streets that closely resembled ice rinks. The testing process had real implications — Austin was seeking the best devices to meet his actual day-to-day needs and avoid falling on his butt.

While testing, we paid careful attention to traction, fit, comfort, and versatility. We determined durability over multiple wears on various surfaces. Every pair of microspikes was assessed on their ability to grip snow, ice, and mud. We ran, hiked, and post-holed to find the best of the best.

As new traction devices hit the market, we’ll be sure to test a pair to see if they make the cut.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose Winter Traction Devices

What Are Traction Devices and How Do They Work?

Most footwear isn’t designed for ice and snow-covered surfaces. Standard rubber-soled boots and shoes are no match for frosted sidewalks and frozen trails. In the cold climates of the northern United States and elsewhere, snow often covers the ground from November to May.

Winter traction devices — also known as ice cleats or microspikes — attach directly to a shoe or boot to bite onto slick surfaces and improve grip. Designs and intended applications vary, but all traction devices are meant to prevent slippage and improve safety.

Some traction devices on this list utilize a pattern of steel coils, while others have cleats or spikes. Every traction device utilizes some kind of harness to snugly attach to a boot or shoe. Traction devices are generally compatible with all kinds of footwear. Ultimately, any traction device is better than nothing, but some work better than others for certain applications.

Types of Traction: Coils vs. Studs vs Spikes

Traction devices rely on a variety of materials and designs to improve grip. The ubiquitous Yaktrax Pro Traction has a series of steel coils that run in an X-shaped pattern from toe to heel. While coils are a reliable option for non-technical everyday use, they aren’t as aggressive or biting as metal studs or spikes.

Studs — or cleats — are small metal points typically no thicker than the tip of a pen. These points are usually made from ultra-hard carbon steel compounds called carbide. They work exactly like football cleats, stabbing into the ice with every step. Studs are the preferred traction solution for runners, as they are lower profile and shallower than spikes. On this list, the Korkers Ice Runner utilizes replaceable steel carbide studs to great effect.

Teeth-shaped crampon-style spikes tend to be more aggressive than coils or studs. Steel spikes dig deep into the snow, ice, mud, and dirt. For steep technical hiking, spikes are the most secure choice. On this list, the Hillsound Trail Crampons are rugged spikes for serious winter hikes. They won’t work for climbing vertical terrain, but they’re great for trekking in the mountains.

Other Traction System Factors: Length and Number of Spikes/Studs

Traction devices with spikes aren’t automatically “better” than those with studs or coils. No matter which traction system you go with, consider the length, distribution, and total number of studs, spikes, or coils.

If pure traction is your priority, look for a device with coils, studs, or spikes across the entire underfoot area. Some styles, like the Black Diamond Blitz, only have spikes in the forefoot. While this minimalist design improves packability, it increases the potential of a slip and fall. Typically, 10-12 evenly distributed studs or spikes will provide the best grip and performance for winter walks and hikes. As for coils, the Yaktrax Pro features coils that stretch across the whole foot.

As for length, longer spikes and studs are more aggressive, which is helpful on steep and rough terrain. The most rugged traction devices have long spikes and a lot of them. Hillsound’s Trail Crampons have long 5/8″ spikes that did deep into snow and ice. Long spikes can be a nuisance for runners, as they tend to disrupt the user’s natural stride. For general use, the Kahtoola EXOspikes have shallow studs, which are sufficient for most users.

Casual In-Town Use vs. Hiking-Specific Traction Devices

In snowy cities like Duluth and Syracuse, a single step out the front door might require walking on ice or snow. If you need a traction device for everyday commutes to the grocery store or library, we recommend a pair with a less-aggressive non-performance-oriented tread pattern. The Yaktrax Pro is a tried-and-true low-profile option that you can hardly feel when it’s strapped on your shoes. It’s perfect for flat surfaces, and it won’t break the bank.

If you live in a hilly area and require something with a bit more bite, the Icetrekkers Diamond Grip is a great middle ground. Its free-spinning steel beads are more aggressive than the basic Yaktrax coils, but they’re still relatively lightweight and unobtrusive. For occasional short hikes on unpaved trails, these ICEtrekkers are fully capable.

The next step up is the hiking category. Traction devices like the Hillsound Trail Crampon have many long, sharp spikes that dig into the ground underfoot like an ice axe. Aggressive hiking designs are best suited for semi-steep unmaintained trails. Longer spikes tend to be heavier, and they do impact your natural gait, but they’re absolutely essential on slick, high-consequence terrain.

Harnesses

Traction devices use harnesses to remain firmly fixed to the user’s foot. Typically, harnesses are made from rubber or a rubber-plastic compound, which has elastic qualities and holds up to abuse. With that said, some harnesses are more durable than others, and they tend to be the first component to fall apart. A good well-fitted harness keeps the underfoot traction system from sliding around.

On this list, the Hillsound Train Crampons have a durable harness that is both secure and lightweight. It’s easy to put on and take off with its sizable pull tab, and the eyelets that hold the traction system are thick and reinforced. On the other end of the spectrum, the ICEtrekkers Diamond Grip has a semi-thin standard rubber harness that feels less durable.

While most harnesses simply stretch around the outside of a shoe’s sole, some are more advanced. The Korkers Ice Runner uses a BOA adjustment system to fully sandwich the foot between two contoured plates. The resulting fit is exceptionally secure — which is exactly what runners need.

Weight

Some traction devices weigh as little as 4 ounces per pair, while some of the beefier hiking styles can weigh as much as 12 ounces. Naturally, minimalist options like the Black Diamond Blitz Spikes weigh very little, and the aggressive Hillsound Trail Crampons are relatively hefty.

As weight increases, so do durability and overall grip. More spikes and thicker harnesses improve performance, but the ounces do add up. For everyday comfort, it’s nice to stick to lighter options. On this list, Kahtoola’s EXOspikes weigh just 7.3 ounces per pair — an excellent middle ground of weight and all-around performance.

Packability

Packability is a concern for outdoorsy folks who will need to carry their microspikes when they’re not in use. Backpackers should check out Black Diamond’s minimal Blitz Spikes — which pack down to the size of an apple and weigh less than an iPhone.

Rugged models like the Hillsound Trail Crampons aren’t very packable, but that’s the price you pay for long spikes and a heavy-duty harness.

Sizing

Every brand of traction devices will offer a size guide that will help you identify the right fit. In our experience, these guides are accurate. If you’re seeking a precise fit for running or technical hiking, look for a model with a customizable harness such as the Korkers Ice Runner.

Temperature Ratings

In extremely cold temperatures, rubber traction device harnesses can become brittle and snap. All of the recommendations on this list are built to handle freezing temperatures, and most users will not encounter an issue.

However, If you plan to use your microspikes in the artic tundra, for example, it’s worth checking the temperature rating. On this list, the Kahtoola EXOspikes are rated to -22 degrees Fahrenheit and the Yaktrax Pro can withstand temps down to -41.

Traction Devices vs. Crampons and Snowshoes

Winter traction devices are different from crampons and snowshoes. Crampons are designed for technical climbing, and snowshoes are designed for preventing post-holing when walking on accumulated snow. The traction devices on this list offer neither of those benefits.

If you’re seeking gear for technical ascents, look for a pair of bonified crampons. If you need a wider platform for staying afloat in soft snow, check out our favorite snowshoes of 2023.

FAQ

Hiking

The Best Winter Boots for Men in 2023

From hiking boots to snow boots, these are the best winter boots for men of 2022, including top picks from Danner, KEEN, Kamik, and more.

Testing snowshoes in Crested Butte, CO; (photo/Jason Hummel)

” data-medium-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2022/11/DSC05347-copy-300×200.jpg” data-large-file=”https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2022/11/DSC05347-copy-700×467.jpg” />

Winter

The Best Snowshoes of 2023

After hours of research and months of testing, we found the best snowshoes for every use and budget. And don’t miss our buyer’s guide with…

The post The Best Winter Traction Devices of 2023 appeared first on GearJunkie.

Against the sprawling snowfields and ice-choked channels of the Canadian Arctic, you’ll often find Sarah McNair-Landry in frenetic motion.

The Iqualuit, Nunavut-born athlete hones her multiple adventure skills throughout every season. From ocean kayaking to glacier travel to big wall climbing and dog sledding, it’s all in a lifetime’s work for a world-class Arctic explorer.

But what makes McNair-Landry’s robust engine run, and what impact do her experiences make on her? Those are the topics in “My 2020,” a documentary that “creates a fascinating logbook punctuated by extreme sports and breathtaking northern landscapes, from Nunavut to Idaho.”

The diary-style action follows McNair-Landry, her longtime companion Erik Boomer, and their trusty sled dogs as they cover ground and ponder adventure sports’ biggest questions. “Isolation, freedom, the future of recreational tourism, and the quiet power of the great outdoors” all make the list.

So, settle in for a frozen meditation and check out “My 2020,” which premieres for free today thanks to the National Film Board of Canada.

Runtime: 34 minutes

Sail the Arctic Seas: ‘Dream Trip’ Includes Fjords, Whales, Polar Bears, and More

Grab the rigging and haul up the sails. You’re about to embark on a trip to one of the most remote places on the planet. Read more…

The post Sled Dogs and Sunsets: A Year in the Life of an Arctic Adventurer appeared first on GearJunkie.

Surviving Alaska’s weather, wildlife, and wilderness is tough. Really, really tough. Just ask Jack London or any of the others who answered The Last Frontier’s siren song over the years, only to find dreams of northern romance dashed by brutal Alaskan reality.

A TV show premiering this April hopes to play on that brutality, pitting eight teams of two against the elements — and each other — as they race through Alaska in pursuit of a cool $500,000. Race To Survive comprises six races spread out over 6 weeks. In each race, the teams will traverse some of Alaska’s wildest terrain, sourcing their food and water along the way.

The last team to finish each race is eliminated. The rest go on to the next challenge. In the end, only one team will remain standing.

‘Race To Survive’ Adventure Race

A peak at the trailer reveals the hurdles in store: exposed ridges, glacial traverses, apex predators, tumbling whitewater, claustrophobic understory, gastrointestinal distress, and, of course, all the mental challenges that come with moving fast and hard over gnarly terrain. And it seems like there might also be some social elements to the contest.

“Tested like never before, participants will endure physical pain while forging alliances and backstabbing their way to claim a spot in the finale and the chance to win the $500,000 if they can survive the hostile land … and each other,” reads a press release for the show.

Shades of Survivor, anyone?

As for the teams, they seem to have legitimate backcountry chops. The father-son duo, Jeff and Hunter Leininger, are experienced adventure racers, while Inupiaq brothers Wilson and Oliver Hoogendorn bring youthful energy and a lifetime of Alaskan experience to the table (they climbed Denali in 13 days and then skied down it). Other contestants are doctors, pilots, mountaineers, climbers, long-distance backpackers, wilderness first responders, and military veterans.

It looks to be a stacked field, and it should be interesting to see which team drops first and which duos make it to the final stages. With half a mil on the line, it’s anyone’s guess.

How to Watch

Race To Survive: Alaska premieres April 3 at 11 p.m. ET on USA Network.

New episodes will air every Monday at the same time.

Jason Momoa & Chris Sharma: Watch ‘The Climb’ Reality TV Trailer

The first trailer for the upcoming HBO Max series showcases a mix of bucket-list climbing destinations, including Mallorca and Wadi Rum.  Read more…

The post ‘Race To Survive: Alaska’ Boasts Toughest Adventure Race for $500K appeared first on GearJunkie.

Fanny packs are great for hands-free carry; (photo/Matt Granger)

All the rage in the ’90s and the topic of much ridicule in the decades since, hip/waist/fanny packs are almost certainly here to stay. Heck, more than that — they’re making a strong comeback. From fishing to trail running and travel to bike commuting, fanny packs prove endlessly versatile and useful.

Even the skeptics among us have to admit fanny packs are pretty great. Whether you want to carry a snack, pack your phone, stash hydration, or speed through airport security, a fanny pack helps you do it all without the hassle of slipping shoulder straps or unreachable zippers.

There’s a specialized fanny pack for almost every use, so we rounded up 14 of our favorites for you to consider.

At the end of our comprehensive review, you’ll find our buyer’s guide with helpful tips on how to find the best fanny pack to fit your needs. We’ve also included a specs chart for comparing bags and an FAQ section.

The Best Fanny Packs of 2023

• Best Overall Fanny Pack: Mountainsmith Tour Lumbar Pack
• Best Budget Fanny Pack: Jansport Fifth Avenue Fanny Pack
• Best Running Fanny Pack: Nathan Peak Hydration Waist Pack
• Best Everyday Lightweight Fanny Pack: Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole Mini Hip Pack
• Best Backpacking Fanny Pack: Thrupack Summit Bum Classic
• Best Around-Town Fanny Pack: BAGGU Fanny Pack
• Best Fishing Fanny Pack: Patagonia Guidewater Hip Pack

Best Overall Fanny Pack

Mountainsmith Tour Lumbar Pack

Specs

• Capacity 9 L (Men’s), 6 L (Women’s)
• Dimensions 11.5″ x 10″ x 5″
• Weight 1 lb., 9 oz.
• Number of pockets Three external, two water bottle, two hipbelt

Pros

• Large capacity
• Water bottle pockets
• Comfortable, padded back
• Front compression attachment system for stashing a jacket

Cons

• Bulky
• Can get heavy if packed full
• Not an everyday fanny pack

Mallory Paige

Long known for making bomber lumbar packs, Mountainsmith’s Tour pack ($90) lives up to that reputation. It has plenty of features and is just the right size for a day hike. For hydration on the trail, each of the side pockets holds a 32-ounce bottle. Or you can stash one with water and one with snacks for fast access on the trail.

The bungee cord is great for storing a rain jacket, and the padded back provides plenty of comfort. The interior foam-padded pocket keeps your tablet (or beloved Kindle) safe, and the hip pocket can hold a large smartphone.

Though packed with many helpful features and a large carrying capacity for time on the trail, this lumbar pack might be a little too much for someone who is looking for something more casual to also carry around town.

The Mountainsmith Tour fanny pack wins best overall for its comfort, size, and functionality for many activities in the outdoors. It’s a great choice for hikers, dog walkers, anglers, mountain bikers, and more, with ample space for accessories. We think it’s the best fanny pack available today.

Check Price at REI

Best Budget Fanny Pack

Jansport Fifth Avenue Fanny Pack

Specs

• Capacity 2.5 L
• Dimensions 6” x 12.5” x 4”
• Weight 4 oz.
• Number of pockets One main zippered, one front

Pros

• Lightweight
• Comes in many different colors and patterns
• Affordable

Cons

• No inner security pocket
• No breathable mesh back

Mallory Paige

This simple Fifth Avenue fanny pack from Jansport ($20) is an excellent budget option. An affordable price, simple yet functional design, and many different colors and patterns to choose from make it a great choice for everyday carry.

The adjustable waist belt allows you to wear this pack comfortably as a crossbody bag. And the Fifth Avenue’s small size prevents it from getting too heavy and having the strap dig into your shoulder.

Throughout use, the fabric was robust, being made with a strong, 600-denier ripstop polyester. We also loved that the textile is constructed from 100% recycled materials.

There are some features on our top-rated fanny packs that are lacking in this simple bag. Our testers prefer fanny packs to have a security pocket, which is a small interior pocket where your valuables are more tucked away. We also like bags with mesh backs for breathability, which becomes especially noticeable on hikes, bike rides, or long dog walks. 

Other than these missing attributes, the Fifth Avenue Fanny Pack from Jansport is a great, fun choice for those with a tight purse.

Check Price at AmazonCheck Price at Jansport

Best Running Fanny Pack

Nathan Peak Hydration Waist Pack

Specs

• Capacity 0.25 L
• Dimensions 12″ x 6″ x 5″
• Weight 6 oz.
• Number of pockets One zippered stretch, one water bottle

Pros

• Minimalist running pack for water and essentials
• Light
• Comfortable and ergonomic fit with minimal bounce
• Includes a water flask
• Angled bottle holder allows for one-handed access

Cons

• Very small capacity
• No pocket for storing a jacket
• Expect some bounce while running
• Specialized, sporty look

Mallory Paige

Trail runners and endurance athletes rejoice! The Nathan Peak Hydration Waist Pack ($40) was meant for you. The streamlined design keeps it light and comfortable while still having enough space to hold a snack, the included 18-ounce water bottle, keys, and phone.

The extended side panels hug the body securely, and the expandable zippered pocket keeps essentials at hand. We especially like the included SpeedDraw Flask and the angle of the bottle pocket, which makes it easy to grab and stash your water on the go.

While the Hydration Waist Pack does a great job at staying close to your body and keeps the water bottle small enough that it doesn’t feel like a huge encumbrance while you run, it’s hard to make a fanny pack that is absolutely bounce-free. So expect some bounce in this waist pack on your runs.

This waist pack is best suited for runners or hikers or dog walkers who want a fanny pack that can carry some water as well, and don’t mind a very specialized, sporty look.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry

Best Everyday Lightweight Fanny Pack

Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole Mini Hip Pack

Specs

• Capacity 1 L
• Dimensions 8″ x 4.75″ x 2″
• Weight 3.5 oz.
• Number of pockets Two zippered

Pros

• New version is made from all recycled materials
• Can stuff into its own pocket making
• Made of 70-denier, 100% recycled ripstop nylon for durability and weather resistance

Cons

• Minimal capacity

Mallory Paige

The Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole Mini Hip Pack ($35) is perfect for travel, festivals, minimalist hikes, walking the dog, or everyday use. The ripstop nylon fabric is impressively light yet strong. The strap doesn’t offer any padding, but that shouldn’t be a problem because the small nature of this 1L pack prevents heavy loads.

As an added portability bonus, the pack folds into its own pocket when not in use. It’s perfect for stashing in your carry-on just in case or keeping it as a backup in the car. It’s available in a variety of colors.

As mentioned above, this fanny pack has a 1L capacity, making it one of the smaller packs in our fleet. So, don’t expect to carry much with this everyday pack. It won’t be able to fit a book or e-reader, but it’s perfect for a phone, wallet, keys, some chapstick, and a few other small accessories.

This is a great choice for someone who needs a small, high-quality pack that is made of weather-resistant nylon, and can carry the essentials for you when your pockets are not quite enough. For overall build quality, this is one of the best fanny packs you’ll find.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry

Best Backpacking Fanny Pack

Thrupack Summit Bum Classic

Specs

• Capacity 2.5 L
• Dimensions 9″ x 5″ x 3″
• Weight 3.5 oz.
• Number of pockets One zippered, one drop-in

Pros

• Highly customizable
• Can be worn five different ways
• Made by thru-hikers, for thru-hikers
• High-quality materials

Cons

• Certain accessories sold separately
• Interior pockets are quite small
• No exterior pocket

Mallory Paige

Made specifically with the thru-hiker in mind, the Summit Bum ($50) from Norfolk, Virginia-based Thrupack is customizable and practical and made by actual long-distance thru-hikers who realized how useful fanny packs were on the trail.

Our senior editor Nick Belcaster used a Summit Bum during a 2018 thru-hike of the Pacific Crest Trail and carried snacks, his phone, and a full mirrorless camera setup in it for thousands of miles.

This fanny pack can be worn five different ways: as a standard fanny pack around the waist, through your backpack’s hip belt (best for simple webbing hip belts up to 1.5 inches wide and at least 8 inches between hip-belt padding), across your chest with its two included lightweight carabiner attachments, as a crossbody bag, and around your backpack.

With 11 different colors to choose from plus the option of purchasing a Comfy Strap, this is the most customizable fanny pack in our lineup, and its thoughtful design makes it well worth the moderate cost.

This fanny pack is minimalist, however, and doesn’t translate as well off the trail as an everyday pack. With no interior space division, this is the most minimalist fanny pack in our lineup in terms of pocket space.

If you like the organizational qualities extra pockets provide, then this might not be the choice for you. But if you’re a thru-hiker planning your next trip on the trail, the Summit Bum just might be the accessory that makes your experience that much better.

Check Price at Thrupack

Best Around-Town Fanny Pack

BAGGU Fanny Pack

Specs

• Capacity 1.7 L
• Dimensions 6.5″ x 8″ x 2″
• Weight 5.7 oz.
• Number of pockets Two zippered

Pros

• Large capacity
• Simple and stylish
• Made of high-quality recycled materials
• BAGGU will send a strap extender for free

Cons

• No padding on strap

Mallory Paige

This spacious fanny pack from BAGGU ($52) is the best everyday, around-town fanny pack in our lineup. With two large main compartments, this pack could hold our wallet, keys, and phone with plenty of room for more. A small notebook, e-reader, sunscreen, hand sanitizer, and some snacks also made their way inside easily. Made of durable, recycled nylon, this pack can also be worn like a crossbody bag.

You might want to be careful, however, in loading it up too much. The strap has no padding on it and could become uncomfortable if walking around all day with heavier items inside.

We enjoyed the spaciousness and style of this BAGGU fanny for everyday use and think its simple look, functionality, and array of colors and patterns to choose from make it the best around-town fanny pack for almost anyone.

Check Price at AmazonCheck Price at Baggu

Best Fishing Fanny Pack

Patagonia Guidewater Hip Pack

Specs

• Capacity 9 L
• Dimensions 13″ x 9″ x 9″
• Weight 1 lb., 6 oz.
• Number of pockets One external zippered, one internal zippered

Pros

• Very large capacity can fit all your fishing essentials
• Nylon with a PU face coating and a TPU back coating makes this a durable and waterproof pack
• Exterior loops and webbing for additional gear carry space

Cons

• Expensive
• Large, technical fanny pack not meant for everyday wear
• Can get heavy if packed full, making it more difficult to hike with

Mallory Paige

For adventurers who seek the water, the Patagonia Guidewater Hip Pack ($239) may be the best option. The Guidewater is a technical, waterproof lumbar pack with a roomy interior pocket, thick, comfortable pads on the waist strap that feel great all day long, and additional features like daisy chain webbing loops on the outside to attach accessories.

This pack is designed with a large central pocket and a smaller detachable pocket inside for things like phones or wallets. And it’s waterproof-rated to IPX-7, thanks to waterproof zippers and fabric.

This technical fanny pack is definitely overkill for those looking for something simple to take into the outdoors, with a high price tag to reflect that. And at 9 L, it can be easy to overpack with heavy items and make you wonder if a small backpack might have been the better choice.

But Patagonia markets the Guidewater Hip Pack for fishing and water-laden activities, and it’s the perfect pack for those dedicated to those pursuits.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Patagonia

Best of the Rest

Dakine Hot Laps 5L Hydration Waistpack

Specs

• Capacity 5 L
• Dimensions 12″ x 7″ x 4.5″
• Weight 1 lb., 3.2 oz.
• Number of pockets Two zippered body, one zippered hipbelt

Pros

• Includes a 2 L water reservoir
• Large capacity for layers, snacks, and tools
• Air mesh back panel keeps you cool

Cons

• Too bulky for running
• Bladder takes up a lot of space when full, limiting the capacity for storing other items

Mallory Paige

Want to stay hydrated on your bike ride but prefer the lighter, cooler freedom of a waist pack? Meet the Hot Laps Waistpack ($90). This pack holds a 2L hydration pack so you can enjoy hands-free sipping while toting extra food and gear in the zippered pocket.

We found it the perfect capacity to hold water, a bike tool, snacks, and a spare tube. And the magnetic buckle did a fantastic job holding the hydration hose in place.

This is a great choice for mountain biking and lightweight hiking. Be forewarned, though, it’s not good for running. The larger capacity inevitably leads to a lot of bouncing around and fighting with the straps.

But if you’re a mountain bike enthusiast, heading out to the flowy singletrack and looking for a hydration waist pack option, the Hot Laps bag is for you.

Check Price at REI

Fjallraven Kanken Hip Pack

Specs

• Capacity 2 L
• Dimensions 7″ x 4.7″ x 3.5″
• Weight 4.7 oz.
• Number of pockets Two zippered front, one zippered back

Pros

• Tough canvas design
• Available in many different color schemes

Cons

• Not 100% waterproof

Mallory Paige

There’s good reason the Fjallraven Kanken Hip Pack ($55) is becoming increasingly popular. The 2L capacity is just enough to hold all of the essentials without being overly bulky. And the canvas has proven durable through heavy use.

It also sheds water well. It’s not waterproof, but if you get caught in a light rain biking across town, your gear will stay dry.

It has a hidden zipper pocket on the back to keep your ID or cards close at hand. And internal pockets aid in organization. All in all, this is a great pack for travel or daily use.

Check Price at REI

Cotopaxi Bataan

Specs

• Capacity 3 L
• Dimensions 11″ x 5.5″ x 3″
• Weight 4 oz.
• Number of pockets One zippered

Pros

• Great carrying capacity for everyday use or for quick day hikes or dog walks
• Stylish, fun colors
• Made of repurposed nylon

Cons

• Thin webbing hipbelt
• Can’t order specific color combinations – each bag is unique

Mallory Paige

The Cotopaxi Bataan ($33) is a fanny pack ready for a good time. The main compartment has a two-way zipper, which makes accessing gear a cinch. And the two internal mesh pockets keep small items easily accessible. And in case you hadn’t noticed yet, it comes in Cotopaxi’s signature bright colors.

Best of all, it’s extra versatile and quality-made with recycled materials. The 3-liter size holds all the necessities without weighing you down. And the single webbing waist strap is simple and comfortable.

You might not want to get attached to a specific colorway, however, because each fanny pack is designed by employees in the Phillippines with control over the final colors of the product. Therefore what you receive might not look quite like what you chose.

All in all, the Bataan is a great pack for biking around town, hanging out with friends, or wearing every day to add some color and flair to your lifestyle.

Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry

Hyperlite Mountain Gear Versa Fanny Pack

Specs

• Capacity 2.25 L
• Dimensions 2.25″ x 6″ x 9″
• Weight 3 oz.
• Number of pockets One zippered main, one front, one back stash

Pros

• Ultralight
• Made of waterproof, high-quality materials
• Compatible with backpack waist belts and sternum straps

Cons

• Expensive
• Good for backpacking or everyday wear but not enough features for a day hike
• White model gets dirty quickly

Mallory Paige

When it comes to ultralight pursuits, the Versa Fanny Pack ($79) from Hyperlite won’t weigh you down. This minimalist pack will be the perfect addition to your backpacking adventures so you can keep your essentials close.

With a wide clamshell opening, the pack can easily store and provide access to things you might need like snacks, bear spray, sunscreen, or a GPS device. An internal mesh pocket allows you to divide your items, and a bonus front zipper pocket is great for smaller items like chapstick or keys.

A pouch on the back with side openings can be used to slip the fanny pack over your backpack’s waist strap for seamless integration. Made with waterproof Dyneema composite fabrics, this fanny will keep your things dry in an unexpected shower.

Be forewarned, however, that the white model is prone to getting dirty. And while this might not be a problem on the trail where everything will be covered with dirt anyway, if you’re buying this pack to primarily use around town, you’ll have to clean the outside frequently as dirt becomes quickly apparent.

Minimalist enough for the trail but stylish enough for everyday use, the Versa is a versatile, ultralight option.

Check Price at Hyperlite Mountain Gear

North St. Pioneer 9 Hip Pack

Specs

• Capacity 2.65 L
• Dimensions 9″ x 6″ x 3″
• Weight 5.7 oz.
• Number of pockets Two zippered

Pros

• Made in the U.S.
• Comes in an array of stylish designs and colors
• Can be made into a bicycle handlebar bag with purchase of an attachment kit
• Made of high-quality, durable, and recycled materials

Cons

• Pricey
• Bike attachment kit sold separately

Mallory Paige

Made in Portland, Oregon, the North St. Pioneer 9 Hip Pack ($85) features a removable belt, comes in a variety of stylish colors, and even has a lifetime warranty. We’ve been using this pack for several years now, and it still looks as good as it did on day one.

Use it as your daily fanny pack, hook it on the handlebars of your bike, or fill it with toiletries for a functional Dopp kit. The 2.6-liter capacity will hold plenty of gear, and the DWR exterior finish gives it water-resistant protection.

To attach it to your bike, however, you’ll need to buy additional attachments that aren’t included in the price of this already slightly pricey pack.

The Pioneer 9 is a great choice for fanny pack aficionados looking for a quality made-in-the-U.S. option, and around-town bike enthusiasts looking for a handlebar bag. For its overall design, it’s one of the best fanny packs available.

Check Price at North St. Bags

SoJourner Fanny Pack

Specs

• Capacity 3.4 L
• Dimensions 11.5″ x 7″ x 4″
• Weight 6 oz.
• Number of pockets Three zippered

Pros

• Light
• Simple design with three pockets for organization
• Comes in fun colors and patterns

Cons

• Made of cheap materials
• Too simple to be useful in the outdoors

Mallory Paige

The SoJourner Fanny Pack ($15) is a no-frills fanny pack that gets the job done. And the price tag is hard to beat. It features a large main compartment plus a front zippered pocket and a stash pocket in the back to keep valuables close.

This pack is great for traveling, biking to meet friends for a microbrew and, of course, keeping it weird at music festivals all summer long (check out some of the wild prints available).

It holds just enough to be useful (keys, cash, credit card, and phone) but has limited space, so it’s not really suited for activities like hiking or mountain biking where you would want room for a wind layer or a water bottle. And because it is the least expensive of any of the fanny packs in our lineup, it sacrifices quality and durability, being made without YKK zippers or waterproof nylon.

The SoJourner fanny pack is perfect for the budget-conscious person who wants something simple for around town or something fun for their next music festival or Halloween costume, and doesn’t mind sacrificing some quality for a great price.

Check Price at AmazonCheck Price at Walmart

Monos Metro Sling

Specs

• Capacity 1.8 L
• Dimensions 10.2″ x 5.5″ x 1.9″
• Weight 12 oz.
• Number of pockets One zippered

Pros

• Made with high-quality materials
• Comes in a vegan version
• Interior fabric made from recycled plastic bottles
• Stylish

Cons

• Expensive
• Not hybrid for any outdoor activities

Mallory Paige

The Monos Metro Sling ($75) brings a new level of chic to the hip-pack game. Available in a nylon-twill or vegan leather, both options are water-repelling and well-made.

The 1.8-liter size is just enough to hold all of the everyday carry essentials without being overly bulky. The main compartment keeps things organized with an internal zippered pocket and two small stash pockets. We also really like the discreet zippered pocket on the backside of the pack.

While it’s great for keeping your phone easily accessible or stashing important documents while traveling, the Metro Sling isn’t a hybrid fanny pack for outdoor activities.

Whether you carry this as a sling or wear it as a traditional waist pack, this bag will elevate your everyday carry if you’re looking for something stylish exclusively for around-town or city life.

Check Price at Monos